Distinguishing between Decaffeinated and Regular Coffee by HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS, Chemometrics, and Machine Learning
Coffee, one of the most popular beverages in the world, attracts consumers by its rich aroma and the stimulating effect of caffeine. Increasing consumers prefer decaffeinated coffee to regular coffee due to health concerns. There are some main decaffeination methods commonly used by commercial coffee producers for decades. However, a certain amount of the aroma precursors can be removed together with caffeine, which could cause a thin taste of decaffeinated coffee. To understand the difference between regular and decaffeinated coffee from the volatile composition point of view, headspace solid-phase microextraction two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS) was employed to examine the headspace volatiles of eight pairs of regular and decaffeinated coffees in this study. Using the key aroma-related volatiles, decaffeinated coffee was significantly separated from regular coffee by principal component analysis (PCA). Using feature-selection tools (univariate analysis: t-test and multivariate analysis: partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)), a group of pyrazines was observed to be significantly different between regular coffee and decaffeinated coffee. Pyrazines were more enriched in the regular coffee, which was due to the reduction of sucrose during the decaffeination process. The reduction of pyrazines led to a lack of nutty, roasted, chocolate, earthy, and musty aroma in the decaffeinated coffee. For the non-targeted analysis, the random forest (RF) classification algorithm was used to select the most important features that could enable a distinct classification between the two coffee types. In total, 20 discriminatory features were identified. The results suggested that pyrazine-derived compounds were a strong marker for the regular coffee group whereas furan-derived compounds were a strong marker for the decaffeinated coffee samples.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:27 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) - 27(2022), 6 vom: 10. März |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zou, Yun [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
3G6A5W338E |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 01.04.2022 Date Revised 01.04.2022 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/molecules27061806 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338654178 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM338654178 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226001146.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/molecules27061806 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1128.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338654178 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35335174 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)1806 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zou, Yun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Distinguishing between Decaffeinated and Regular Coffee by HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS, Chemometrics, and Machine Learning |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 01.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 01.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Coffee, one of the most popular beverages in the world, attracts consumers by its rich aroma and the stimulating effect of caffeine. Increasing consumers prefer decaffeinated coffee to regular coffee due to health concerns. There are some main decaffeination methods commonly used by commercial coffee producers for decades. However, a certain amount of the aroma precursors can be removed together with caffeine, which could cause a thin taste of decaffeinated coffee. To understand the difference between regular and decaffeinated coffee from the volatile composition point of view, headspace solid-phase microextraction two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS) was employed to examine the headspace volatiles of eight pairs of regular and decaffeinated coffees in this study. Using the key aroma-related volatiles, decaffeinated coffee was significantly separated from regular coffee by principal component analysis (PCA). Using feature-selection tools (univariate analysis: t-test and multivariate analysis: partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)), a group of pyrazines was observed to be significantly different between regular coffee and decaffeinated coffee. Pyrazines were more enriched in the regular coffee, which was due to the reduction of sucrose during the decaffeination process. The reduction of pyrazines led to a lack of nutty, roasted, chocolate, earthy, and musty aroma in the decaffeinated coffee. For the non-targeted analysis, the random forest (RF) classification algorithm was used to select the most important features that could enable a distinct classification between the two coffee types. In total, 20 discriminatory features were identified. The results suggested that pyrazine-derived compounds were a strong marker for the regular coffee group whereas furan-derived compounds were a strong marker for the decaffeinated coffee samples | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a PCA | |
| 650 | 4 | |a PLS-DA | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aroma profile | |
| 650 | 4 | |a coffee | |
| 650 | 4 | |a decaffeination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a random forest | |
| 650 | 4 | |a solid-phase microexaction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a t-test | |
| 650 | 4 | |a time-of-flight mass spectrometry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a two-dimensional gas chromatography | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Coffee |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Caffeine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 3G6A5W338E |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gaida, Meriem |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Franchina, Flavio A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stefanuto, Pierre-Hugues |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Focant, Jean-François |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) |d 2004 |g 27(2022), 6 vom: 10. März |w (DE-627)NLM172073448 |x 1420-3049 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2022 |g number:6 |g day:10 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061806 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 27 |j 2022 |e 6 |b 10 |c 03 | ||