Sealing ability of three different root repair materials for furcation perforation repair : An in vitro study
Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry..
AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Angelus, Biodentine™, and EndoSequence cement in furcation perforations using protein leakage assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted using seventy extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars with intact furcation. The samples were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 20) based on repair material used: Group 1 - MTA-Angelus, Group 2 - Biodentine™, and Group 3 - EndoSequence. Two additional groups served as positive and negative controls (n = 5). Using the leakage assessment apparatus, the presence of protein was detected with a reagent (Coomassive Brilliant Blue) every day for 60 days. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test were used for statistical analysis using SPSS software.
RESULTS: All the groups exhibited protein leakage from day 1. Biodentine showed minimum (0.1201 mg/ml), MTA showed maximum (0.3738 mg/ml), and EndoSequence had intermediate (0.2465 mg/ml) leakage. None in the negative control and all of the positive control specimens leaked during the experimental period of 60 days.
CONCLUSION: The newer biomaterials, Biodentine and Endosequence with better handling properties, could be used as alternatives to MTA-Angelus while repairing furcation perforations.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:23 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD - 23(2020), 1 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 62-65 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kakani, Abhijeet K [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Biodentine |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 18.04.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.4103/JCD.JCD_371_19 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM31790647X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM31790647X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225164239.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.4103/JCD.JCD_371_19 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1059.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM31790647X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33223644 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kakani, Abhijeet K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sealing ability of three different root repair materials for furcation perforation repair |b An in vitro study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 18.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Conservative Dentistry. | ||
| 520 | |a AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Angelus, Biodentine™, and EndoSequence cement in furcation perforations using protein leakage assessment | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was conducted using seventy extracted human maxillary and mandibular molars with intact furcation. The samples were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 20) based on repair material used: Group 1 - MTA-Angelus, Group 2 - Biodentine™, and Group 3 - EndoSequence. Two additional groups served as positive and negative controls (n = 5). Using the leakage assessment apparatus, the presence of protein was detected with a reagent (Coomassive Brilliant Blue) every day for 60 days. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's test were used for statistical analysis using SPSS software | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: All the groups exhibited protein leakage from day 1. Biodentine showed minimum (0.1201 mg/ml), MTA showed maximum (0.3738 mg/ml), and EndoSequence had intermediate (0.2465 mg/ml) leakage. None in the negative control and all of the positive control specimens leaked during the experimental period of 60 days | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The newer biomaterials, Biodentine and Endosequence with better handling properties, could be used as alternatives to MTA-Angelus while repairing furcation perforations | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biodentine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a furcation perforation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a protein leakage | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Veeramachaneni, Chandrasekhar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD |d 2008 |g 23(2020), 1 vom: 25. Jan., Seite 62-65 |w (DE-627)NLM194975037 |x 0972-0707 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:25 |g month:01 |g pages:62-65 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_371_19 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 25 |c 01 |h 62-65 | ||