Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among firefighters/paramedics of a US fire department : a cross-sectional study
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..
OBJECTIVES: We estimate the point seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the frontline firefighter/paramedic workforce of a South Florida fire department located in the epicentre of a State outbreak.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used to estimate the point seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a rapid immunoglobulin (Ig)M-IgG combined point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay among frontline firefighters/paramedics collected over a 2-day period, 16-17 April 2020. Fire department personnel were emailed a survey link assessing COVID-19 symptoms and work exposures the day prior to the scheduled drive-through antibody testing at a designated fire station. Off-duty and on-duty firefighter/paramedic personnel drove through the fire station/training facility in their personal vehicles or on-duty engine/rescue trucks for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing.
RESULTS: Among the 203 firefighters/paramedics that make up the fire department workforce, 18 firefighters/paramedics (8.9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, of which 8 firefighters/paramedics (3.9%) were IgG positive only, 8 (3.9%) were IgM positive only and 2 (0.1%) were IgG/IgM positive. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the serological test is estimated to be 33.2% and the negative predictive value is 99.3%. The average number of COVID-19 case contacts (ie, within 6 feet of an infected person (laboratory-confirmed or probable COVID-19 patient) for ≥15 min) experienced by firefighters/paramedics was higher for those with positive serology compared with those with negative (13.3 cases vs 7.31 cases; p=0.022). None of the antibody positive firefighters/paramedics reported receipt of the annual influenza vaccine compared with firefighters/paramedics who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (0.0% vs 21.0%; p=0.027).
CONCLUSION: Rapid SARS-CoV-2 IgM-IgG antibody testing documented early-stage and late-stage infection in a firefighter workforce providing insight to a broader medical surveillance project on return to work for firefighters/paramedics. Given the relatively low PPV of the serological test used in this study back in April 2020, caution should be used in interpreting test results.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2020 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:77 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Occupational and environmental medicine - 77(2020), 12 vom: 06. Dez., Seite 857-861 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Caban-Martinez, Alberto J [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.11.2020 Date Revised 18.12.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1136/oemed-2020-106676 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM31339153X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM31339153X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225150456.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/oemed-2020-106676 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1044.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM31339153X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)32764107 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Caban-Martinez, Alberto J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among firefighters/paramedics of a US fire department |b a cross-sectional study |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.11.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 18.12.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: We estimate the point seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the frontline firefighter/paramedic workforce of a South Florida fire department located in the epicentre of a State outbreak | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used to estimate the point seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a rapid immunoglobulin (Ig)M-IgG combined point-of-care lateral flow immunoassay among frontline firefighters/paramedics collected over a 2-day period, 16-17 April 2020. Fire department personnel were emailed a survey link assessing COVID-19 symptoms and work exposures the day prior to the scheduled drive-through antibody testing at a designated fire station. Off-duty and on-duty firefighter/paramedic personnel drove through the fire station/training facility in their personal vehicles or on-duty engine/rescue trucks for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Among the 203 firefighters/paramedics that make up the fire department workforce, 18 firefighters/paramedics (8.9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, of which 8 firefighters/paramedics (3.9%) were IgG positive only, 8 (3.9%) were IgM positive only and 2 (0.1%) were IgG/IgM positive. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the serological test is estimated to be 33.2% and the negative predictive value is 99.3%. The average number of COVID-19 case contacts (ie, within 6 feet of an infected person (laboratory-confirmed or probable COVID-19 patient) for ≥15 min) experienced by firefighters/paramedics was higher for those with positive serology compared with those with negative (13.3 cases vs 7.31 cases; p=0.022). None of the antibody positive firefighters/paramedics reported receipt of the annual influenza vaccine compared with firefighters/paramedics who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (0.0% vs 21.0%; p=0.027) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Rapid SARS-CoV-2 IgM-IgG antibody testing documented early-stage and late-stage infection in a firefighter workforce providing insight to a broader medical surveillance project on return to work for firefighters/paramedics. Given the relatively low PPV of the serological test used in this study back in April 2020, caution should be used in interpreting test results | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a biological monitoring | |
650 | 4 | |a communicable diseases | |
650 | 4 | |a epidemiology | |
650 | 4 | |a health and safety | |
650 | 4 | |a virology | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Viral |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Immunoglobulin G |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Immunoglobulin M |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Influenza Vaccines |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Schaefer-Solle, Natasha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Santiago, Katerina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Louzado-Feliciano, Paola |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brotons, Angel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gonzalez, Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Issenberg, S Barry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kobetz, Erin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Occupational and environmental medicine |d 1997 |g 77(2020), 12 vom: 06. Dez., Seite 857-861 |w (DE-627)NLM074656678 |x 1470-7926 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2020 |g number:12 |g day:06 |g month:12 |g pages:857-861 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106676 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 77 |j 2020 |e 12 |b 06 |c 12 |h 857-861 |