Clinical and Economic Consequences of Switching From Omalizumab to Mepolizumab in Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: an Observational Retrospective Study

Abstract Background: Severe asthma is burdened by frequent exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids, which worsen patients’ health and increase healthcare spending. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and economic impact of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in patients eligible for both biologics, but not optimally controlled by omalizumab.Methods: We retrospectively enrolled uncontrolled severe asthmatic patients, referred to seven asthma clinics in Italy, who switched from omalizumab to mepolizumab during the last two years. Clinical, functional, and laboratory information included blood eosinophil count, asthma control test, spirometry, serum IgE, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, oral corticosteroids intake, use of controller and rescue drugs, exacerbations/hospitalizations, visits and diagnostic exams. Within the perspective of Italian National Health System, a pre- and post-mepolizumab 12-month standardized total cost per patient was calculated.Results: 33 patients were enrolled: 5 males and 28 females, mean age 57 years, mean disease onset 24 years. At omalizumab discontinuation, 88% were oral corticosteroids-dependent with annual mean rate of 4.0 clinically significant exacerbations, 0.30 exacerbations needing emergency room visits or hospitalization; absenteeism due to disease was 10.4 days per patient. Switch to mepolizumab improved all clinical outcomes, reducing total exacerbation rate (RR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.14), oral corticosteroids -dependent patients (OR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.005 to 0.08), and the number of lost working days because of uncontrolled disease (Δ = -7.9, 95% CI -11.2 to -4.6). Pulmonary function improved, as well as serum IgE, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and eosinophils decreased. Mean annual costs were € 12,239 for omalizumab and € 12,639 for mepolizumab (Δ = € 400, 95% CI -1,588 to 2,389); the increment due to drug therapy (+ € 1,581) was almost offset by savings regarding all other cost items (- € 1,181). Conclusions: Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, not controlled by omalizumab, experienced comprehensive benefits in asthma control by switching to mepolizumab. These relevant improvements were burdened by only very slight increases in economic costs..

Medienart:

Preprint

Erscheinungsjahr:

2020

Erschienen:

2020

Enthalten in:

ResearchSquare.com - (2020) vom: 27. Okt. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2020

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana [VerfasserIn]
Resta, Emanuela [VerfasserIn]
Povero, Massimiliano [VerfasserIn]
Pelaia, Corrado [VerfasserIn]
D'Amato, Mariella [VerfasserIn]
Crimi, Nunzio [VerfasserIn]
Scichilone, Nicola [VerfasserIn]
Scioscia, Giulia [VerfasserIn]
Resta, Onofrio [VerfasserIn]
Calabrese, Cecilia [VerfasserIn]
Pelaia, Girolamo [VerfasserIn]
Barbero, Maria Pia Foschino [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext [kostenfrei]

doi:

10.21203/rs.3.rs-96335/v1

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

XRA034722785