“No Thanks, I Don’t Want to See Snakes Again”: A Qualitative Study of Pain Management Versus Preservation of Cognition in Palliative Care Patients

Abstract BackgroundTowards the end of life, use of opioid analgesics becomes more common in patients to control pain and improve quality of life. While pain medication may help manage pain, unwanted cognitive side effects are frequently noted. This balancing act presents a trade-off for patients between pain relief and adverse effects, where the desire to relieve pain must be evaluated against the desire to maintain cognitive clarity and may represent a difficult decision for patients receiving palliative care. Our goal was to understand how patients’ decision making about pain medications balances the pain relief from those medications against the cognitive decline often associated with them.MethodsWe conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients receiving home-based palliative care from a program in Toronto, Canada. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsThirty-one interviews were conducted. Some patients preferred cognitive preservation over pain management because of a sense that cognition is central to their identity, the desire to maintain lucidity, a desire to continue participating in work or hobbies, and fear of addiction. Conversely, some patients preferred pain management over cognitive preservation because of a desire to avoid suffering, an inability to sleep without medications, or an acceptance of some cognitive compromise. A few patients attempted to find balance through tapering drugs, limiting their use of breakthrough analgesic doses, or using alternative strategies. ConclusionsDecision making around pain and pain management is a highly preference-sensitive process—with no clear right or wrong decisions, only the preferences of each patient. The findings from this study may influence the design of future patient-facing decision aids around pain management. Future studies should pilot interventions to better assist patients with this decision..

Medienart:

Preprint

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

ResearchSquare.com - (2022) vom: 28. Juli Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2022

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Wegier, Pete [VerfasserIn]
Varenbut, Jaymie [VerfasserIn]
Bernstein, Mark [VerfasserIn]
Lawlor, Peter G [VerfasserIn]
Isenberg, Sarina R [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext [lizenzpflichtig]
Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:

570
Biology

doi:

10.21203/rs.3.rs-57944/v1

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

XRA034340319