Comparison of Bayesian approaches for developing prediction models in rare disease: application to the identification of patients with Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young

Abstract Background Clinical prediction models can help identify high-risk patients and facilitate timely interventions. However, developing such models for rare diseases presents challenges due to the scarcity of affected patients for developing and calibrating models. Methods that pool information from multiple sources can help with these challenges.Methods We compared three approaches for developing clinical prediction models for population-screening based on an example of discriminating a rare form of diabetes (Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young - MODY) in insulin-treated patients from the more common Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Two datasets were used: a case-control dataset (278 T1D, 177 MODY) and a population-representative dataset (1418 patients, 96 MODY tested with biomarker testing, 7 MODY positive). To build a population-level prediction model, we compared three methods for recalibrating models developed in case-control data. These were prevalence adjustment (“offset”), shrinkage recalibration in the population-level dataset (“recalibration”), and a refitting of the model to the population-level dataset (“re-estimation”). We then developed a Bayesian hierarchical mixture model combining shrinkage recalibration with additional informative biomarker information only available in the population-representative dataset. We developed prior information from the literature and other data sources to deal with missing biomarker and outcome information and to ensure the clinical validity of predictions for certain biomarker combinations.Results The offset, re-estimation, and recalibration methods showed good calibration in the population-representative dataset. The offset and recalibration methods displayed the lowest predictive uncertainty due to borrowing information from the fitted case-control model. We demonstrate the potential of a mixture model for incorporating informative biomarkers, which significantly enhanced the model’s predictive accuracy, reduced uncertainty, and showed higher stability in all ranges of predictive outcome probabilities.Conclusion We have compared several approaches that could be used to develop prediction models for rare diseases. Our findings highlight the recalibration mixture model as the optimal strategy if a population-level dataset is available. This approach offers the flexibility to incorporate additional predictors and informed prior probabilities, contributing to enhanced prediction accuracy for rare diseases. It also allows predictions without these additional tests, providing additional information on whether a patient should undergo further biomarker testing before genetic testing..

Medienart:	Preprint

Erscheinungsjahr:	2024
Erschienen:	2024

Enthalten in:	bioRxiv.org - (2024) vom: 18. Apr. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024

Sprache:	Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:	Cardoso, Pedro [VerfasserIn] McDonald, Timothy J. [VerfasserIn] Patel, Kashyap A. [VerfasserIn] Pearson, Ewan R. [VerfasserIn] Hattersley, Andrew T. [VerfasserIn] Shields, Beverley M. [VerfasserIn] McKinley, Trevelyan J. [VerfasserIn]

Links:	Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:	570 Biology

doi:	10.1101/2024.01.22.24301429

funding:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	XBI042273102