Sex and gender differences in adverse events following receipt of influenza and COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers
ABSTRACT Introduction Active and passive surveillance studies have found that a greater proportion of females report adverse events (AE) following receipt of either the COVID-19 or seasonal influenza vaccine compared to males. We sought to determine the intersection of biological sex and sociocultural gender differences in prospective active reporting of vaccine outcomes, which remains poorly characterized.Methods This cohort study enrolled Johns Hopkins Health System healthcare workers (HCWs) who were recruited from the annual fall 2019-2022 influenza vaccine and the fall 2022 COVID-19 bivalent vaccine campaigns. Vaccine recipients were enrolled the day of vaccination and AE surveys were administered two days post-vaccination (DPV) for bivalent COVID-19 and Influenza vaccine recipients. Data were collected regarding the presence of a series of solicited local and systemic AEs. Open-ended answers about participants’ experiences with AEs also were collected for the COVID-19 vaccine recipients.Results Females were more likely to report local AEs after influenza (OR=2.28, p=0.001) or COVID-19 (OR=2.57, p=0.008) vaccination compared to males, regardless of age or race. Males and females had comparable probabilities of reporting systemic AEs after influenza (OR=1.18, p=0.552) or COVID-19 (OR=0.96, p=0.907) vaccination. Exogenous hormones from birth control use did not impact the rates of reported AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among reproductive-aged female HCWs. Women reported more interruptions in their daily routine following COVID-19 vaccination than men and were more likely to seek out self-treatment. More women than men scheduled their COVID-19 vaccination before their days off in anticipation of AEs.Conclusions Our findings highlight the need for sex- and gender-inclusive policies to inform more effective occupational health vaccination strategies. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential disruption of AEs on occupational responsibilities following mandated vaccination for healthcare workers and to more fully characterize the post-vaccination behavioral differences between men and women.KEY MESSAGE What is already known on this topic <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Among diversely aged adults 18-64 years, females report more AEs to vaccines, including the influenza and COVID-19 vaccines, than males.<jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Vaccine AEs play a role in shaping vaccine hesitancy and uptake.<jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Vaccine uptake related to influenza and COVID-19 are higher among men than women.<jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Research that addresses both the sex and gender disparities of vaccine outcomes and behaviors is lacking.What this study adds <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:label>⇒</jats:label>This prospective active reporting study uses both quantitative and qualitative survey data to examine sex and gender differences in AEs following influenza or COVID-19 vaccination among a cohort of reproductive-aged healthcare workers.How this study might affect research, practice, or policy <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Sex and gender differences in AEs and perceptions relating to vaccination should drive the development of more equitable and effective vaccine strategies and policies in occupational health settings..
| Medienart: |
|
|---|
Preprint| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
bioRxiv.org - (2024) vom: 22. Jan. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Yin, Anna [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1101/2024.01.17.24301440 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
XBI04221162X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | XBI04221162X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240123090413.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240119s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1101/2024.01.17.24301440 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)XBI04221162X | ||
| 035 | |a (biorXiv)10.1101/2024.01.17.24301440 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yin, Anna |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-1612-5532 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sex and gender differences in adverse events following receipt of influenza and COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a ABSTRACT Introduction Active and passive surveillance studies have found that a greater proportion of females report adverse events (AE) following receipt of either the COVID-19 or seasonal influenza vaccine compared to males. We sought to determine the intersection of biological sex and sociocultural gender differences in prospective active reporting of vaccine outcomes, which remains poorly characterized.Methods This cohort study enrolled Johns Hopkins Health System healthcare workers (HCWs) who were recruited from the annual fall 2019-2022 influenza vaccine and the fall 2022 COVID-19 bivalent vaccine campaigns. Vaccine recipients were enrolled the day of vaccination and AE surveys were administered two days post-vaccination (DPV) for bivalent COVID-19 and Influenza vaccine recipients. Data were collected regarding the presence of a series of solicited local and systemic AEs. Open-ended answers about participants’ experiences with AEs also were collected for the COVID-19 vaccine recipients.Results Females were more likely to report local AEs after influenza (OR=2.28, p=0.001) or COVID-19 (OR=2.57, p=0.008) vaccination compared to males, regardless of age or race. Males and females had comparable probabilities of reporting systemic AEs after influenza (OR=1.18, p=0.552) or COVID-19 (OR=0.96, p=0.907) vaccination. Exogenous hormones from birth control use did not impact the rates of reported AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among reproductive-aged female HCWs. Women reported more interruptions in their daily routine following COVID-19 vaccination than men and were more likely to seek out self-treatment. More women than men scheduled their COVID-19 vaccination before their days off in anticipation of AEs.Conclusions Our findings highlight the need for sex- and gender-inclusive policies to inform more effective occupational health vaccination strategies. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential disruption of AEs on occupational responsibilities following mandated vaccination for healthcare workers and to more fully characterize the post-vaccination behavioral differences between men and women.KEY MESSAGE What is already known on this topic <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Among diversely aged adults 18-64 years, females report more AEs to vaccines, including the influenza and COVID-19 vaccines, than males.<jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Vaccine AEs play a role in shaping vaccine hesitancy and uptake.<jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Vaccine uptake related to influenza and COVID-19 are higher among men than women.<jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Research that addresses both the sex and gender disparities of vaccine outcomes and behaviors is lacking.What this study adds <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:label>⇒</jats:label>This prospective active reporting study uses both quantitative and qualitative survey data to examine sex and gender differences in AEs following influenza or COVID-19 vaccination among a cohort of reproductive-aged healthcare workers.How this study might affect research, practice, or policy <jats:list list-type="simple"><jats:label>⇒</jats:label>Sex and gender differences in AEs and perceptions relating to vaccination should drive the development of more equitable and effective vaccine strategies and policies in occupational health settings. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Biology |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 570 |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Nadia |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shea, Patrick J. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rosser, Erica N. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuo, Helen |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shapiro, Janna R. |0 (orcid)0000-0001-8088-2506 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fenstermacher, Katherine Z.J. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pekosz, Andrew |0 (orcid)0000-0003-3248-1761 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rothman, Richard E. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Klein, Sabra L. |0 (orcid)0000-0002-0730-5224 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Morgan, Rosemary |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5009-8470 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t bioRxiv.org |g (2024) vom: 22. Jan. |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:22 |g month:01 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.17.24301440 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_XBI | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 22 |c 01 | ||