Challenges With Segmenting Intraoperative Ultrasound For Brain Tumours
Abstract Objective Addressing the challenges that come with identifying and delineating brain tumours in intraoperative ultrasound. Our goal is to both qualitatively and quantitatively assess the interobserver variation, amongst experienced neuro-oncological intraoperative ultrasound users (neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists), in detecting and segmenting brain tumours on ultrasound. We then propose that, due to the inherent challenges of this task, annotation by localisation of the entire tumour mass with a bounding box could serve as an ancillary solution to segmentation for clinical training, encompassing margin uncertainty and the curation of large datasets.Methods 30 ultrasound images of brain lesions in 30 patients were annotated by 4 annotators - 1 neuroradiologist and 3 neurosurgeons. The annotation variation of the 3 neurosurgeons was first measured, and then the annotations of each neurosurgeon were individually compared to the neuroradiologist’s, which served as a reference standard as their segmentations were further refined by cross-reference to the preoperative MRI. The following statistical metrics were used: Intersection Over Union, Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. These annotations were then converted into bounding boxes for the same evaluation.Results There was a moderate level of interobserver variance between the neurosurgeons [IoU:0.789, DSC:0.876, HD:103.227] and a larger level of variance when compared against the MRI-informed reference standard annotations by the neuroradiologist, mean across annotators [IoU:0.723, DSC:0.813, HD:115.675]. After converting the segments to bounding boxes, all metrics improve, most significantly, the interquartile range drops by [IoU:37%, DSC:41%, HD:54%].Conclusion This study highlights the current challenges with detecting and defining tumour boundaries in neuro-oncological intraoperative brain ultra-Sound. We then show that bounding box annotation could serve as a useful complementary approach for both clinical and technical reasons..
| Medienart: |
|
|---|
Preprint| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
bioRxiv.org - (2023) vom: 18. Dez. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023 |
|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Weld, Alistair [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1101/2023.12.13.23299820 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
XBI041878329 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | XBI041878329 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231218091102.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231215s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1101/2023.12.13.23299820 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)XBI041878329 | ||
| 035 | |a (biorXiv)10.1101/2023.12.13.23299820 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Weld, Alistair |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-2951-5652 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Challenges With Segmenting Intraoperative Ultrasound For Brain Tumours |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Objective Addressing the challenges that come with identifying and delineating brain tumours in intraoperative ultrasound. Our goal is to both qualitatively and quantitatively assess the interobserver variation, amongst experienced neuro-oncological intraoperative ultrasound users (neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists), in detecting and segmenting brain tumours on ultrasound. We then propose that, due to the inherent challenges of this task, annotation by localisation of the entire tumour mass with a bounding box could serve as an ancillary solution to segmentation for clinical training, encompassing margin uncertainty and the curation of large datasets.Methods 30 ultrasound images of brain lesions in 30 patients were annotated by 4 annotators - 1 neuroradiologist and 3 neurosurgeons. The annotation variation of the 3 neurosurgeons was first measured, and then the annotations of each neurosurgeon were individually compared to the neuroradiologist’s, which served as a reference standard as their segmentations were further refined by cross-reference to the preoperative MRI. The following statistical metrics were used: Intersection Over Union, Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. These annotations were then converted into bounding boxes for the same evaluation.Results There was a moderate level of interobserver variance between the neurosurgeons [IoU:0.789, DSC:0.876, HD:103.227] and a larger level of variance when compared against the MRI-informed reference standard annotations by the neuroradiologist, mean across annotators [IoU:0.723, DSC:0.813, HD:115.675]. After converting the segments to bounding boxes, all metrics improve, most significantly, the interquartile range drops by [IoU:37%, DSC:41%, HD:54%].Conclusion This study highlights the current challenges with detecting and defining tumour boundaries in neuro-oncological intraoperative brain ultra-Sound. We then show that bounding box annotation could serve as a useful complementary approach for both clinical and technical reasons. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Biology |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 570 |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dixon, Luke |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Anichini, Giulio |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patel, Neekhil |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nimer, Amr |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dyck, Michael |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a O’Neill, Kevin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lim, Adrian |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Giannarou, Stamatia |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Camp, Sophie |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t bioRxiv.org |g (2023) vom: 18. Dez. |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |g day:18 |g month:12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.13.23299820 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_XBI | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2023 |b 18 |c 12 | ||