Clinical coding of long COVID in primary care 2020-2023 in a cohort of 19 million adults: an OpenSAFELY analysis
Abstract Background Long COVID is the patient-coined term for the persistent symptoms of COVID-19 illness for weeks, months or years following the acute infection. There is a large burden of long COVID globally from self-reported data, but the epidemiology, causes and treatments remain poorly understood. Primary care is used to help identify and treat patients with long COVID and therefore Electronic Health Records (EHRs) of past COVID-19 patients could be used to help fill these knowledge gaps. We aimed to describe those with long COVID in primary care records in England.Methods With the approval of NHS England we used routine clinical data from over 19 million adults in England linked to SARS-COV-2 test result, hospitalisation and vaccination data to describe trends in the recording of 16 clinical codes related to long COVID between November 2020 and January 2023. We calculated rates per 100,000 person-years and plotted how these changed over time. We compared crude and minimally adjusted rates of recorded long COVID in patient records between different key demographic and vaccination characteristics using negative binomial models.Findings We identified a total of 55,465 people recorded to have long COVID over the study period, with incidence of new long COVID records increasing steadily over 2021, and declining over 2022. The overall rate per 100,000 person-years was 177.5 cases in women (95% CI: 175.5-179) and 100.5 men (99.5-102). In terms of vaccination against COVID-19, the lowest rates were observed in those with 3+ vaccine doses (103.5 [95% CI: 101.5-105]). Finally, the majority of those with a long COVID record did not have a recorded positive SARS-COV-2 test 12 weeks before the long COVID record.Interpretation EHR recorded long COVID remains very low compared and incident records of long COVID declined over 2022. We found the lowest rates of recorded long COVID in people with 3 or more vaccine doses. We summarised several sources of possible bias for researchers using EHRs to study long COVID..
| Medienart: |
|
|---|
Preprint| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
bioRxiv.org - (2023) vom: 07. Dez. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023 |
|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Henderson, Alasdair D [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1101/2023.12.04.23299364 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
XBI041769686 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | XBI041769686 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231208114041.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1101/2023.12.04.23299364 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)XBI041769686 | ||
| 035 | |a (biorXiv)10.1101/2023.12.04.23299364 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Henderson, Alasdair D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical coding of long COVID in primary care 2020-2023 in a cohort of 19 million adults: an OpenSAFELY analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Background Long COVID is the patient-coined term for the persistent symptoms of COVID-19 illness for weeks, months or years following the acute infection. There is a large burden of long COVID globally from self-reported data, but the epidemiology, causes and treatments remain poorly understood. Primary care is used to help identify and treat patients with long COVID and therefore Electronic Health Records (EHRs) of past COVID-19 patients could be used to help fill these knowledge gaps. We aimed to describe those with long COVID in primary care records in England.Methods With the approval of NHS England we used routine clinical data from over 19 million adults in England linked to SARS-COV-2 test result, hospitalisation and vaccination data to describe trends in the recording of 16 clinical codes related to long COVID between November 2020 and January 2023. We calculated rates per 100,000 person-years and plotted how these changed over time. We compared crude and minimally adjusted rates of recorded long COVID in patient records between different key demographic and vaccination characteristics using negative binomial models.Findings We identified a total of 55,465 people recorded to have long COVID over the study period, with incidence of new long COVID records increasing steadily over 2021, and declining over 2022. The overall rate per 100,000 person-years was 177.5 cases in women (95% CI: 175.5-179) and 100.5 men (99.5-102). In terms of vaccination against COVID-19, the lowest rates were observed in those with 3+ vaccine doses (103.5 [95% CI: 101.5-105]). Finally, the majority of those with a long COVID record did not have a recorded positive SARS-COV-2 test 12 weeks before the long COVID record.Interpretation EHR recorded long COVID remains very low compared and incident records of long COVID declined over 2022. We found the lowest rates of recorded long COVID in people with 3 or more vaccine doses. We summarised several sources of possible bias for researchers using EHRs to study long COVID. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Biology |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 570 |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Butler-Cole, Ben FC |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tazare, John |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tomlinson, Laurie A |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marks, Michael |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jit, Mark |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Briggs, Andrew |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Liang-Yu |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carlile, Oliver |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bates, Chris |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Parry, John |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bacon, Sebastian CJ |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dillingham, Iain |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dennison, William A |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Costello, Ruth E |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wei, Yinghui |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Walker, Alex J |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hulme, William |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goldacre, Ben |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mehrkar, Amir |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a MacKenna, Brian |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Herrett, Emily |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Eggo, Rosalind M |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t bioRxiv.org |g (2023) vom: 07. Dez. |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |g day:07 |g month:12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.04.23299364 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_XBI | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2023 |b 07 |c 12 | ||