Covid-19 affects taste independently of smell: results from a combined chemosensory home test and online survey from a global cohort (N=10,953)
Abstract People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with ten household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 3,356 self-reported a positive and 602 a negative COVID-19 diagnosis (COVID+ and COVID-, respectively); 1,267 were awaiting test results (COVID?). The rest reported no respiratory illness and were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N=4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste loss (OthS, N=832), and no symptoms (NoS, N=416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95%-CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95%-CI: 10-25%) intensity. In all groups, perceived intensity of smell (r=0.84), taste (r=0.68), and oral irritation (r=0.37) was correlated. Our findings suggest most reports of taste dysfunction with COVID-19 were genuine and not due to misinterpreting smell loss as taste loss (i.e., a classical taste-flavor confusion). Assessing smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and helps to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests..
Medienart: |
Preprint |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
bioRxiv.org - (2023) vom: 20. Jan. Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2023 |
---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Nguyen, Ha [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
---|
doi: |
10.1101/2023.01.16.23284630 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
XBI038450003 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | XBI038450003 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230429094313.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230119s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1101/2023.01.16.23284630 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)XBI038450003 | ||
035 | |a (biorXiv)10.1101/2023.01.16.23284630 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Nguyen, Ha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Covid-19 affects taste independently of smell: results from a combined chemosensory home test and online survey from a global cohort (N=10,953) |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract People often confuse smell loss with taste loss, so it is unclear how much gustatory function is reduced in patients self-reporting taste loss. Our pre-registered cross-sectional study design included an online survey in 12 languages with instructions for self-administering chemosensory tests with ten household items. Between June 2020 and March 2021, 10,953 individuals participated. Of these, 3,356 self-reported a positive and 602 a negative COVID-19 diagnosis (COVID+ and COVID-, respectively); 1,267 were awaiting test results (COVID?). The rest reported no respiratory illness and were grouped by symptoms: sudden smell/taste changes (STC, N=4,445), other symptoms excluding smell or taste loss (OthS, N=832), and no symptoms (NoS, N=416). Taste, smell, and oral irritation intensities and self-assessed abilities were rated on visual analog scales. Compared to the NoS group, COVID+ was associated with a 21% reduction in taste (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 15-28%), 47% in smell (95%-CI: 37-56%), and 17% in oral irritation (95%-CI: 10-25%) intensity. In all groups, perceived intensity of smell (r=0.84), taste (r=0.68), and oral irritation (r=0.37) was correlated. Our findings suggest most reports of taste dysfunction with COVID-19 were genuine and not due to misinterpreting smell loss as taste loss (i.e., a classical taste-flavor confusion). Assessing smell and taste intensity of household items is a promising, cost-effective screening tool that complements self-reports and helps to disentangle taste loss from smell loss. However, it does not replace standardized validated psychophysical tests. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Biology |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
650 | 4 | |a 570 |7 (dpeaa)DE-84 | |
700 | 1 | |a Albayay, Javier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Höchenberger, Richard |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bhutani, Surabhi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boesveldt, Sanne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Busch, Niko A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Croijmans, Ilja |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cooper, Keiland W. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a de Groot, Jasper H. B. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Farruggia, Michael C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fjaeldstad, Alexander W. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hayes, John E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hummel, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Joseph, Paule V. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Laktionova, Tatiana K. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Thomas-Danguin, Thierry |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Veldhuizen, Maria G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Voznessenskaya, Vera V. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Parma, Valentina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pepino, M. Yanina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ohla, Kathrin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t bioRxiv.org |g (2023) vom: 20. Jan. |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |g day:20 |g month:01 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.16.23284630 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_XBI | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2023 |b 20 |c 01 |