Measuring Dependence between Events

Measuring dependence between two events, or equivalently between two binary random variables, amounts to expressing the dependence structure inherent in a $2\times 2$ contingency table in a real number between $-1$ and $1$. Countless such dependence measures exist, but there is little theoretical guidance on how they compare and on their advantages and shortcomings. Thus, practitioners might be overwhelmed by the problem of choosing a suitable measure. We provide a set of natural desirable properties that a proper dependence measure should fulfill. We show that Yule's Q and the little-known Cole coefficient are proper, while the most widely-used measures, the phi coefficient and all contingency coefficients, are improper. They have a severe attainability problem, that is, even under perfect dependence they can be very far away from $-1$ and $1$, and often differ substantially from the proper measures in that they understate strength of dependence. The structural reason is that these are measures for equality of events rather than of dependence. We derive the (in some instances non-standard) limiting distributions of the measures and illustrate how asymptotically valid confidence intervals can be constructed. In a case study on drug consumption we demonstrate how misleading conclusions may arise from the use of improper dependence measures..

Medienart:

Preprint

Erscheinungsjahr:

2024

Erschienen:

2024

Enthalten in:

arXiv.org - (2024) vom: 26. März Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Pohle, Marc-Oliver [VerfasserIn]
Dimitriadis, Timo [VerfasserIn]
Wermuth, Jan-Lukas [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:

510
Statistics - Methodology

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

XAR043052894