Atrial conduction explains the occurrence of the P‐wave dispersion phenomenon, but weakly
Abstract Background P‐wave dispersion (PWD) is believed to be caused by inhomogeneous atrial conduction. This statement, however, is based on limited little solid evidence. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between atrial conduction and PWD by means of invasive electrophysiological studies. Methods Cross‐sectional study in 153 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) undergoing an electrophysiological study. Different atrial conduction times were measured and correlated with PWD. Results Only the interatrial (P‐DCS) and left intra‐atrial conduction times (ΔDCS‐PCS) showed a significant correlation with PWD, but this correlation was weak. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined that both P‐DCS (β = 0.242; P = .008) and ΔDCS‐PCS (β = 0.295; P < .001) are independent predictors of PWD. Performing the multivariate analysis for arrhythmic substrates, it is observed that only ΔDCS‐PCS continued to be an independent predictor of PWD. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that regardless of the types of arrhythmic substrates, PWD discriminates significantly, but moderately, to patients with P‐DCS and ΔDCS‐PCS ≥75 percentile. Conclusions Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times were directly and significantly correlated with PWD, but only weakly, and were independent predictors of PWD. In general, PWD correctly discriminates patients with high values in interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times, but moderately. This is maintained in cases with accessory pathways; however, in patients with AVNRT it only does so for intraleft atrial conduction times. Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times weakly explains PWD..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:36 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of Arrhythmia - 36(2020), 6, Seite 1083-1091 |
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Carmona Puerta, Raimundo [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© 2020 Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1002/joa3.12444 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
WLY00906379X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WLY00906379X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307183515.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230217s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/joa3.12444 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a JOA3_JOA312444.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)WLY00906379X | ||
| 035 | |a (WILEY)JOA312444 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ASE |
| 100 | 1 | |a Carmona Puerta, Raimundo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Atrial conduction explains the occurrence of the P‐wave dispersion phenomenon, but weakly |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © 2020 Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Background P‐wave dispersion (PWD) is believed to be caused by inhomogeneous atrial conduction. This statement, however, is based on limited little solid evidence. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between atrial conduction and PWD by means of invasive electrophysiological studies. Methods Cross‐sectional study in 153 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) undergoing an electrophysiological study. Different atrial conduction times were measured and correlated with PWD. Results Only the interatrial (P‐DCS) and left intra‐atrial conduction times (ΔDCS‐PCS) showed a significant correlation with PWD, but this correlation was weak. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined that both P‐DCS (β = 0.242; P = .008) and ΔDCS‐PCS (β = 0.295; P < .001) are independent predictors of PWD. Performing the multivariate analysis for arrhythmic substrates, it is observed that only ΔDCS‐PCS continued to be an independent predictor of PWD. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that regardless of the types of arrhythmic substrates, PWD discriminates significantly, but moderately, to patients with P‐DCS and ΔDCS‐PCS ≥75 percentile. Conclusions Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times were directly and significantly correlated with PWD, but only weakly, and were independent predictors of PWD. In general, PWD correctly discriminates patients with high values in interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times, but moderately. This is maintained in cases with accessory pathways; however, in patients with AVNRT it only does so for intraleft atrial conduction times. Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times weakly explains PWD. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Chávez González, Elibet |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rabassa López‐Calleja, Magda Alina |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lorenzo Martínez, Elizabeth |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cruz Elizundia, Juan Miguel |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Padrón Peña, Gustavo |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rodríguez González, Fernando |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Arrhythmia |g 36(2020), 6, Seite 1083-1091 |w (DE-627)WLY00906043X |x 18832148 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2020 |g number:6 |g pages:1083-1091 |g extent:9 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_WLY | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2020 |e 6 |h 1083-1091 |g 9 | ||