Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Formulations of Tenofovir Alafenamide
Abstract The study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of 2 brands of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) fumarate tablets. This research was a 2‐preparation, 2‐sequence, 4‐period crossover, completely replicated study in 68 healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The mean values of the area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to the last time point with blood sample collection (AUC0‐t), area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0‐∞), and maximum concentration (C max) for the test and reference products of TAF were 248.5 and 275.7 ng/mL, 148.1 and 157.8 ng • h/mL, and 148.4 and 158.1 ng • h/mL, respectively, under the fasting condition. On the other hand, the mean value of C max, AUC0‐t, and AUC0‐∞ for the test and reference formulations of TAF were 244.6 and 246.7 ng/mL, 230.4 and 244.9 ng • h/mL, and 233.2 and 246.2 ng • h/mL, respectively, under the fed condition. The 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios of AUC0–t and AUC0‐∞ of TAF in fasting and fed states were within the bioequivalence acceptance limits when tested using the average‐bioequivalence method. The point estimate value for geometric mean ratio of C max in fasting and fed states (88.4% and 95.5%, respectively) were within the bioequivalence acceptance limits as per the reference‐scaled average‐bioequivalence method. The safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that the test formulations of TAF exhibited bioequivalence to the reference and were well tolerated by healthy Chinese subjects (Study Registry Identification Number: CTR20190086; CTR20190087)..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development - 10(2021), 12, Seite 1519-1527 |
Beteiligte Personen: |
Li, Zhihui [VerfasserIn] |
---|
BKL: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
© American College of Clinical Pharmacology |
---|
Umfang: |
9 |
---|
doi: |
10.1002/cpdd.985 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
WLY003866696 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | WLY003866696 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230307132159.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230214s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||und c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/cpdd.985 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a CPDD_CPDD985.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)WLY003866696 | ||
035 | |a (WILEY)CPDD985 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ASE |
084 | |a 44.38 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Li, Zhihui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Formulations of Tenofovir Alafenamide |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
300 | |a 9 | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © American College of Clinical Pharmacology | ||
520 | |a Abstract The study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of 2 brands of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) fumarate tablets. This research was a 2‐preparation, 2‐sequence, 4‐period crossover, completely replicated study in 68 healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The mean values of the area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to the last time point with blood sample collection (AUC0‐t), area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0‐∞), and maximum concentration (C max) for the test and reference products of TAF were 248.5 and 275.7 ng/mL, 148.1 and 157.8 ng • h/mL, and 148.4 and 158.1 ng • h/mL, respectively, under the fasting condition. On the other hand, the mean value of C max, AUC0‐t, and AUC0‐∞ for the test and reference formulations of TAF were 244.6 and 246.7 ng/mL, 230.4 and 244.9 ng • h/mL, and 233.2 and 246.2 ng • h/mL, respectively, under the fed condition. The 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios of AUC0–t and AUC0‐∞ of TAF in fasting and fed states were within the bioequivalence acceptance limits when tested using the average‐bioequivalence method. The point estimate value for geometric mean ratio of C max in fasting and fed states (88.4% and 95.5%, respectively) were within the bioequivalence acceptance limits as per the reference‐scaled average‐bioequivalence method. The safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that the test formulations of TAF exhibited bioequivalence to the reference and were well tolerated by healthy Chinese subjects (Study Registry Identification Number: CTR20190086; CTR20190087). | ||
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Jingyan |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ju, Gehang |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yan, Keyu |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mao, Yong |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Qingchun |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yang, Xinlu |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Rong |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Qiu, Wen |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development |g 10(2021), 12, Seite 1519-1527 |w (DE-627)WLY003864545 |x 21607648 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2021 |g number:12 |g pages:1519-1527 |g extent:9 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_WLY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OPC-ASE | ||
936 | b | k | |a 44.38 |q ASE |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 10 |j 2021 |e 12 |h 1519-1527 |g 9 |