Complete tumor necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy defines good responders in patients with Ewing sarcoma

Abstract Background Survival in patients who have Ewing sarcoma is correlated with postchemotherapy response (tumor necrosis). This treatment response has been categorized as the response rate, similar to what has been used in osteosarcoma. There is controversy regarding whether this is appropriate or whether it should be a dichotomy of complete versus incomplete response, given how important a complete response is for in overall survival of patients with Ewing sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact that the amount of chemotherapy‐induced necrosis has on (1) overall survival, (2) local recurrence‐free survival, (3) metastasis‐free survival, and (4) event‐free survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Methods In total, 427 patients who had Ewing sarcoma or tumors in the Ewing sarcoma family and received treatment with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery at 10 international institutions were included. Multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards analyses were used to assess the associations between tumor necrosis and all four outcomes while controlling for clinical factors identified in bivariate analysis, including age, tumor volume, location, surgical margins, metastatic disease at presentation, and preoperative radiotherapy. Results Patients who had a complete (100%) tumor response to chemotherapy had increased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48; p < .01), recurrence‐free survival (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20–0.82; p = .01), metastasis‐free survival (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15–0.46; p ≤ .01), and event‐free survival (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16–0.41; p ≤ .01) compared with patients who had a partial (0%–99%) response. Conclusions Complete tumor necrosis should be the index parameter to grade response to treatment as satisfactory in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Any viable tumor in these patients after neoadjuvant treatment should be of oncologic concern. These findings can affect the design of new clinical trials and the risk‐stratified application of conventional or novel treatments..

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:129

Enthalten in:

Cancer - 129(2023), 1, Seite 60-70

Beteiligte Personen:

Lozano‐Calderón, Santiago A. [VerfasserIn]
Albergo, Jose Ignacio [VerfasserIn]
Groot, Olivier Q. [VerfasserIn]
Merchan, Nelson A. [VerfasserIn]
Abiad, Jad M. [VerfasserIn]
Salinas, Vanessa [VerfasserIn]
Gomez Mier, Luis Carlos [VerfasserIn]
Montoya, Camilo Soto [VerfasserIn]
Ferrone, Marco L. [VerfasserIn]
Ready, John E. [VerfasserIn]
Linares, Francisco J. [VerfasserIn]
Levin, Adam S. [VerfasserIn]
Peleteiro Pensado, Manuel [VerfasserIn]
Pozo Kreilinger, José Juan [VerfasserIn]
Ruiz, Irene Barrientos [VerfasserIn]
Ortiz‐Cruz, Eduardo J. [VerfasserIn]
Gebhardt, Mark C. [VerfasserIn]
Cote, Gregory M. [VerfasserIn]
Choy, Edwin [VerfasserIn]
Spentzos, Dimitrios [VerfasserIn]
Hung, Yin P. [VerfasserIn]
Deshpande, Vikram [VerfasserIn]
Chebib, Ivan A. [VerfasserIn]
McCulloch, Robert Allan [VerfasserIn]
Farfalli, Germán [VerfasserIn]
Aponte Tinao, Luis [VerfasserIn]
Morris, Carol D. [VerfasserIn]
Petur Nielsen, Gunnlaugur [VerfasserIn]
Anderson, Megan E. [VerfasserIn]
Jeys, Lee M. [VerfasserIn]

BKL:

44.81

Anmerkungen:

© 2023 American Cancer Society.

Umfang:

11

doi:

10.1002/cncr.34506

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

WLY003744981