Developing a questionnaire to evaluate an automated audit & feedback intervention: a Rand-modified Delphi method
Background Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy to evaluate and improve medical practice. The optimal design of an A&F system is uncertain and structured process evaluations are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the use of automated A&F systems. Methods Based on the Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) and the REFLECT-52 (REassessing audit & Feedback interventions: a tooL for Evaluating Compliance with suggested besT practices) evaluation tool a questionnaire was designed for the purpose of evaluating automated A&F systems. A Rand-modified Delphi method was used to develop the process evaluation and obtain validation. Fourteen experts from different domains in primary care consented to participate and individually scored the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Afterwards, the questions were discussed in a consensus meeting. After approval, the final questionnaire was compiled. Results A 34-question questionnaire composed of 57 items was developed and presented to the expert panel. The consensus meeting resulted in a selection of 31 questions, subdivided into 43 items. A final list of 30 questions consisting of 42 items was obtained. Conclusion A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was drawn up for the assessment and improvement of automated A&F systems, based on CP-FIT and REFLECT-52 theory and approved by experts. Next steps will be piloting and implementation of the questionnaire..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC health services research - 24(2024), 1 vom: 05. Apr. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Van den Wyngaert, Ine [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| BKL: | |
|---|---|
| Themen: |
Audit and feedback |
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2024 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
SPR055433243 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR055433243 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240406064738.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240406s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR055433243 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s12913-024-10915-2-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Van den Wyngaert, Ine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Developing a questionnaire to evaluate an automated audit & feedback intervention: a Rand-modified Delphi method |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2024 | ||
| 520 | |a Background Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy to evaluate and improve medical practice. The optimal design of an A&F system is uncertain and structured process evaluations are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the use of automated A&F systems. Methods Based on the Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) and the REFLECT-52 (REassessing audit & Feedback interventions: a tooL for Evaluating Compliance with suggested besT practices) evaluation tool a questionnaire was designed for the purpose of evaluating automated A&F systems. A Rand-modified Delphi method was used to develop the process evaluation and obtain validation. Fourteen experts from different domains in primary care consented to participate and individually scored the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Afterwards, the questions were discussed in a consensus meeting. After approval, the final questionnaire was compiled. Results A 34-question questionnaire composed of 57 items was developed and presented to the expert panel. The consensus meeting resulted in a selection of 31 questions, subdivided into 43 items. A final list of 30 questions consisting of 42 items was obtained. Conclusion A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was drawn up for the assessment and improvement of automated A&F systems, based on CP-FIT and REFLECT-52 theory and approved by experts. Next steps will be piloting and implementation of the questionnaire. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical audit |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality of health care |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Audit and feedback |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Process evaluation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Delphi method |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Questionnaire |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Pottelbergh, Gijs |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Coteur, Kristien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vaes, Bert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van den Bulck, Steve |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC health services research |d BioMed Central, 2001 |g 24(2024), 1 vom: 05. Apr. |w (DE-627)SPR028228308 |w (DE-600)2050434-2 |x 1472-6963 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:05 |g month:04 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2 |m X:VERLAG |x 0 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.00 |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 05 |c 04 | ||