Complex interplay of science reasoning and vaccine hesitancy among parents in Shanghai, China
Abstract The psychosocial underpinnings of vaccine hesitancy are complex. Research is needed to pinpoint the exact reasons why people hesitate to vaccinate themselves or their children against vaccine-preventable diseases. One possible reason are concerns that arise from a misunderstanding of vaccine science. We examined the impact of scientific reasoning on vaccine hesitancy and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intent through a cross-sectional study of parents of vaccine-eligible children (N = 399) at immunization clinics in Shanghai, China. We assessed the relationship between science reasoning and both vaccine hesitancy and HPV vaccine acceptance using general additive models. We found a significant association between scientific reasoning and education level, with those with less than a high school education having a significantly lower scientific reasoning that those with a college education (ß = -1.31, p-value = 0.002). However, there was little evidence of a relationship between scientific reasoning and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific reasoning therefore appears not to exert primary influence on the formation of vaccine attitudes among the respondents surveyed. We suggest that research on vaccine hesitancy continues working to identify the styles of reasoning parents engage in when determining whether or not to vaccinate their children. This research could inform the development and implementation of tailored vaccination campaigns..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC public health - 24(2024), 1 vom: 23. Feb. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Zhang, Felicia [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
China |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2024 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12889-024-17990-4 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
SPR054870313 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR054870313 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240224064717.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240224s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12889-024-17990-4 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR054870313 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s12889-024-17990-4-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhang, Felicia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Complex interplay of science reasoning and vaccine hesitancy among parents in Shanghai, China |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2024 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The psychosocial underpinnings of vaccine hesitancy are complex. Research is needed to pinpoint the exact reasons why people hesitate to vaccinate themselves or their children against vaccine-preventable diseases. One possible reason are concerns that arise from a misunderstanding of vaccine science. We examined the impact of scientific reasoning on vaccine hesitancy and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intent through a cross-sectional study of parents of vaccine-eligible children (N = 399) at immunization clinics in Shanghai, China. We assessed the relationship between science reasoning and both vaccine hesitancy and HPV vaccine acceptance using general additive models. We found a significant association between scientific reasoning and education level, with those with less than a high school education having a significantly lower scientific reasoning that those with a college education (ß = -1.31, p-value = 0.002). However, there was little evidence of a relationship between scientific reasoning and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific reasoning therefore appears not to exert primary influence on the formation of vaccine attitudes among the respondents surveyed. We suggest that research on vaccine hesitancy continues working to identify the styles of reasoning parents engage in when determining whether or not to vaccinate their children. This research could inform the development and implementation of tailored vaccination campaigns. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Science literacy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Papillomavirus vaccines |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vaccination |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a China |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surveys and questionnaires |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ren, Jia |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Garon, Colin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Zhuoying |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kubale, John |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wagner, Abram L. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC public health |d London : BioMed Central, 2001 |g 24(2024), 1 vom: 23. Feb. |w (DE-627)SPR027821633 |w (DE-600)2041338-5 |x 1471-2458 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:23 |g month:02 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17990-4 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 23 |c 02 | ||