Assessing support for mental health policies among policy influencers and the general public in Alberta and Manitoba, Canada
Background There is a need to improve mental health policy in Canada to address the growing population burden of mental illness. Understanding support for policy options is critical for advocacy efforts to improve mental health policy. Our purpose was to describe support for population-level healthy public policies to improve mental health among policy influencers and the general public in Alberta and Manitoba; and, identify associations between levels of support and sociodemographic variables and relative to the Nuffield Bioethics Intervention Ladder framework. Methods We used data from the 2019 Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, which recruited a representative sample of the general public in Alberta (n = 1792) and Manitoba (n = 1909) and policy influencers in each province (Alberta n = 291, Manitoba n = 129). Level of support was described for 16 policy options using a Likert-style scale for mental health policy options by province, sample type, and sociodemographic variables using ordinal regression modelling. Policy options were coded using the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Intervention Ladder to classify support for policy options by level of intrusiveness. Results Policy options were categorized as ‘Provide Information’ and ‘Enable Choice’ according to the Nuffield Intervention Ladder. There was high support for all policy options, and few differences between samples or provinces. Strong support was more common among women and among those who were more politically left (versus center). Immigrants were more likely to strongly support most of the policies. Those who were politically right leaning (versus center) were less likely to support any of the mental health policies. Mental health status, education, and Indigenous identity were also associated with support for some policy options. Conclusions There is strong support for mental health policy in Western Canada. Results demonstrate a gap between support and implementation of mental health policy and provide evidence for advocates and policy makers looking to improve the policy landscape in Canada..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of mental health systems - 18(2024), 1 vom: 15. Feb. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Nykiforuk, Candace I. J. [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Attitudes |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2024 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s13033-024-00624-y |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
SPR054789311 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR054789311 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240216064735.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240216s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s13033-024-00624-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR054789311 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s13033-024-00624-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nykiforuk, Candace I. J. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-1017-5475 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing support for mental health policies among policy influencers and the general public in Alberta and Manitoba, Canada |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2024 | ||
| 520 | |a Background There is a need to improve mental health policy in Canada to address the growing population burden of mental illness. Understanding support for policy options is critical for advocacy efforts to improve mental health policy. Our purpose was to describe support for population-level healthy public policies to improve mental health among policy influencers and the general public in Alberta and Manitoba; and, identify associations between levels of support and sociodemographic variables and relative to the Nuffield Bioethics Intervention Ladder framework. Methods We used data from the 2019 Chronic Disease Prevention Survey, which recruited a representative sample of the general public in Alberta (n = 1792) and Manitoba (n = 1909) and policy influencers in each province (Alberta n = 291, Manitoba n = 129). Level of support was described for 16 policy options using a Likert-style scale for mental health policy options by province, sample type, and sociodemographic variables using ordinal regression modelling. Policy options were coded using the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Intervention Ladder to classify support for policy options by level of intrusiveness. Results Policy options were categorized as ‘Provide Information’ and ‘Enable Choice’ according to the Nuffield Intervention Ladder. There was high support for all policy options, and few differences between samples or provinces. Strong support was more common among women and among those who were more politically left (versus center). Immigrants were more likely to strongly support most of the policies. Those who were politically right leaning (versus center) were less likely to support any of the mental health policies. Mental health status, education, and Indigenous identity were also associated with support for some policy options. Conclusions There is strong support for mental health policy in Western Canada. Results demonstrate a gap between support and implementation of mental health policy and provide evidence for advocates and policy makers looking to improve the policy landscape in Canada. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Health policy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mental health |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public opinion |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Knowledge |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Attitudes |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Beliefs |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nuffield Intervention Ladder |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Survey research |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Canada |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cumulative link modelling |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thomson, Mathew |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8155-3840 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Curtin, Kimberley D. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Colman, Ian |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5924-0277 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wild, T. Cameron |0 (orcid)0000-0002-9947-7428 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hyshka, Elaine |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5785-8890 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of mental health systems |d London : Biomed Central, 2007 |g 18(2024), 1 vom: 15. Feb. |w (DE-627)SPR029553113 |w (DE-600)2382266-1 |x 1752-4458 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:02 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-024-00624-y |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 15 |c 02 | ||