Improving postal survey response using behavioural science: a nested randomised control trial
Background Systematic reviews have identified effective strategies for increasing postal response rates to questionnaires; however, most studies have isolated single techniques, testing the effect of each one individually. Despite providing insight into explanatory mechanisms, this approach lacks ecological validity, given that multiple techniques are often combined in routine practice. Methods We used a two-armed parallel randomised controlled trial (n = 2702), nested within a cross-sectional health survey study, to evaluate whether using a pragmatic combination of behavioural science and evidenced-based techniques (e.g., personalisation, social norms messaging) in a study invitation letter increased response to the survey, when compared with a standard invitation letter. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. We tested this in a sample of women testing positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) at cervical cancer screening in England. Results Overall, 646 participants responded to the survey (response rate [RR] = 23.9%). Logistic regression revealed higher odds of response in the intervention arm (n = 357/1353, RR = 26.4%) compared with the control arm (n = 289/1349, RR = 21.4%), while adjusting for age, deprivation, clinical site, and clinical test result (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09–1.55). Conclusion Applying easy-to-implement behavioural science and evidence-based methods to routine invitation letters improved postal response to a health-related survey, whilst adjusting for demographic characteristics. Our findings provide support for the pragmatic adoption of combined techniques in routine research to increase response to postal surveys. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN15113095. Registered 7 May 2019 – retrospectively registered..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC medical research methodology - 21(2021), 1 vom: 18. Dez. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
McBride, Emily [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Behavioural science |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2021 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12874-021-01476-7 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
SPR050367072 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR050367072 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230509100119.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230507s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12874-021-01476-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR050367072 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s12874-021-01476-7-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a McBride, Emily |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9926-429X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Improving postal survey response using behavioural science: a nested randomised control trial |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2021 | ||
| 520 | |a Background Systematic reviews have identified effective strategies for increasing postal response rates to questionnaires; however, most studies have isolated single techniques, testing the effect of each one individually. Despite providing insight into explanatory mechanisms, this approach lacks ecological validity, given that multiple techniques are often combined in routine practice. Methods We used a two-armed parallel randomised controlled trial (n = 2702), nested within a cross-sectional health survey study, to evaluate whether using a pragmatic combination of behavioural science and evidenced-based techniques (e.g., personalisation, social norms messaging) in a study invitation letter increased response to the survey, when compared with a standard invitation letter. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. We tested this in a sample of women testing positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) at cervical cancer screening in England. Results Overall, 646 participants responded to the survey (response rate [RR] = 23.9%). Logistic regression revealed higher odds of response in the intervention arm (n = 357/1353, RR = 26.4%) compared with the control arm (n = 289/1349, RR = 21.4%), while adjusting for age, deprivation, clinical site, and clinical test result (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09–1.55). Conclusion Applying easy-to-implement behavioural science and evidence-based methods to routine invitation letters improved postal response to a health-related survey, whilst adjusting for demographic characteristics. Our findings provide support for the pragmatic adoption of combined techniques in routine research to increase response to postal surveys. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN15113095. Registered 7 May 2019 – retrospectively registered. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a RCT |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Behavioural science |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postal response |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Methodology |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recruitment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trials |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mase, Hiromi |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kerrison, Robert S. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marlow, Laura A. V. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Waller, Jo |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC medical research methodology |d London : BioMed Central, 2001 |g 21(2021), 1 vom: 18. Dez. |w (DE-627)SPR027357392 |w (DE-600)2041362-2 |x 1471-2288 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:18 |g month:12 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01476-7 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 18 |c 12 | ||