Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial
Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18-month period. Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled. Rate of successful/adequate sedation was assessed using the Paediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS). The primary outcome was the efficacy (successful sedation or sedation rate) of the three drugs. One-hundred and ninety-five children were included for the MRI procedure. IND was found to be superior in terms of achieving successful sedation. INM had a shorter onset and duration of sedation compared to IND and TRI, but with an increased failure rate (88.3%). Keeping INM as the reference group, it was found that the odds of sedation increased 4.1 times on changing from INM to IND (p < 0.01), and 2.26 times on changing from INM to TRI (p < 0.01). Adverse events included nasal discomfort (18.3%) in INM group; and self-limited tachycardia (4.6%) and hypotension (10.8%) in the IND group. Conclusion: IND was more efficacious than INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI without any significant adverse events. Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017257; date registered: 25/01/2019.What is Known:• Oral triclofos (TRI) and intranasal midazolam (INM) have been used for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI with variable success; but the experience with intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) is limited.What is New:• IND provides more effective sedation compared to INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI, without any significant adverse events..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:182 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
European journal of pediatrics - 182(2023), 3 vom: 20. Jan., Seite 1385-1391 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chandrasekar, Shyam [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [lizenzpflichtig] |
|---|
| Themen: |
α-2 agonist |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
SPR049719548 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR049719548 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230323113027.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230323s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR049719548 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00431-022-04794-0-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chandrasekar, Shyam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral triclofos (TRI), intranasal midazolam (INM), and intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) in achieving successful sedation in children undergoing MRI. This open-label, three-arm, randomized trial was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over 18-month period. Children scheduled for MRI were enrolled. Rate of successful/adequate sedation was assessed using the Paediatric Sedation State Scale (PSSS). The primary outcome was the efficacy (successful sedation or sedation rate) of the three drugs. One-hundred and ninety-five children were included for the MRI procedure. IND was found to be superior in terms of achieving successful sedation. INM had a shorter onset and duration of sedation compared to IND and TRI, but with an increased failure rate (88.3%). Keeping INM as the reference group, it was found that the odds of sedation increased 4.1 times on changing from INM to IND (p < 0.01), and 2.26 times on changing from INM to TRI (p < 0.01). Adverse events included nasal discomfort (18.3%) in INM group; and self-limited tachycardia (4.6%) and hypotension (10.8%) in the IND group. Conclusion: IND was more efficacious than INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI without any significant adverse events. Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2019/01/017257; date registered: 25/01/2019.What is Known:• Oral triclofos (TRI) and intranasal midazolam (INM) have been used for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI with variable success; but the experience with intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) is limited.What is New:• IND provides more effective sedation compared to INM or TRI for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI, without any significant adverse events. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Sedation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pediatric |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Magnetic resonance imaging |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Benzodiazepine |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a α-2 agonist |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chloral hydrate |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dwibedi, Bhagirathi |0 (orcid)0000-0002-5318-6836 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Das, Rashmi Ranjan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Padhy, Biswa Mohan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Behera, Bikram Kishore |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of pediatrics |d Berlin : Springer Science & Business Media B.V., 1975 |g 182(2023), 3 vom: 20. Jan., Seite 1385-1391 |w (DE-627)SPR005753775 |w (DE-600)2647723-3 |x 1432-1076 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:182 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g day:20 |g month:01 |g pages:1385-1391 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04794-0 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 182 |j 2023 |e 3 |b 20 |c 01 |h 1385-1391 | ||