The CAR-HEMATOTOX score as a prognostic model of toxicity and response in patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Background BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has altered the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma, but is hampered by unique side effects that can lengthen hospital stays and increase morbidity. Hematological toxicity (e.g. profound and prolonged cytopenias) represents the most common grade ≥ 3 toxicity and can predispose for severe infectious complications. Here, we examined the utility of the CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score to predict toxicity and survival outcomes in patients receiving standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel. Methods Data were retrospectively collected from 113 r/r multiple myeloma patients treated between April 2021 and July 2022 across six international CAR-T centers. The HT score—composed of factors related to hematopoietic reserve and baseline inflammatory state—was determined prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Results At lymphodepletion, 63 patients were $ HT^{low} $ (score 0–1) and 50 patients were $ HT^{high} $ (score ≥ 2). Compared to their $ HT^{low} $ counterparts, $ HT^{high} $ patients displayed prolonged severe neutropenia (median 9 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), an increased severe infection rate (40% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and more severe ICANS (grade ≥ 3: 16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). One-year non-relapse mortality was higher in the $ HT^{high} $ group (13% vs. 2%, p = 0.019) and was predominantly attributable to fatal infections. Response rates according to IMWG criteria were higher in $ HT^{low} $ patients (≥ VGPR: 70% vs. 44%, p = 0.01). Conversely, $ HT^{high} $ patients exhibited inferior progression-free (median 5 vs. 15 months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (median 10.5 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). Conclusions These data highlight the prognostic utility of the CAR-HEMATOTOX score for both toxicity and treatment response in multiple myeloma patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T. The score may guide toxicity management (e.g. anti-infective prophylaxis, early G-CSF, stem cell boost) and help to identify suitable CAR-T candidates..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of hematology & oncology - 16(2023), 1 vom: 31. Juli |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Rejeski, Kai [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
BCMA CAR-T |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2023 |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s13045-023-01465-x |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2144787220 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2144787220 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240325144457.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240118s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s13045-023-01465-x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2144787220 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s13045-023-01465-x-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Rejeski, Kai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The CAR-HEMATOTOX score as a prognostic model of toxicity and response in patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2023 | ||
520 | |a Background BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has altered the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma, but is hampered by unique side effects that can lengthen hospital stays and increase morbidity. Hematological toxicity (e.g. profound and prolonged cytopenias) represents the most common grade ≥ 3 toxicity and can predispose for severe infectious complications. Here, we examined the utility of the CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score to predict toxicity and survival outcomes in patients receiving standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel. Methods Data were retrospectively collected from 113 r/r multiple myeloma patients treated between April 2021 and July 2022 across six international CAR-T centers. The HT score—composed of factors related to hematopoietic reserve and baseline inflammatory state—was determined prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Results At lymphodepletion, 63 patients were $ HT^{low} $ (score 0–1) and 50 patients were $ HT^{high} $ (score ≥ 2). Compared to their $ HT^{low} $ counterparts, $ HT^{high} $ patients displayed prolonged severe neutropenia (median 9 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), an increased severe infection rate (40% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and more severe ICANS (grade ≥ 3: 16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). One-year non-relapse mortality was higher in the $ HT^{high} $ group (13% vs. 2%, p = 0.019) and was predominantly attributable to fatal infections. Response rates according to IMWG criteria were higher in $ HT^{low} $ patients (≥ VGPR: 70% vs. 44%, p = 0.01). Conversely, $ HT^{high} $ patients exhibited inferior progression-free (median 5 vs. 15 months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (median 10.5 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). Conclusions These data highlight the prognostic utility of the CAR-HEMATOTOX score for both toxicity and treatment response in multiple myeloma patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T. The score may guide toxicity management (e.g. anti-infective prophylaxis, early G-CSF, stem cell boost) and help to identify suitable CAR-T candidates. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Chimeric antigen receptor | |
650 | 4 | |a BCMA CAR-T | |
650 | 4 | |a Hematological toxicity | |
650 | 4 | |a Cytopenias | |
650 | 4 | |a Multiple myeloma | |
650 | 4 | |a Infections | |
700 | 1 | |a Hansen, Doris K. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bansal, Radhika |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sesques, Pierre |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ailawadhi, Sikander |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Logue, Jennifer M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bräunlein, Eva |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cordas dos Santos, David M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Freeman, Ciara L. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Alsina, Melissa |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Theurich, Sebastian |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yucai |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Krackhardt, Angela M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Locke, Frederick L. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bachy, Emmanuel |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jain, Michael D. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Yi |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Subklewe, Marion |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of hematology & oncology |d BioMed Central, 2008 |g 16(2023), 1 vom: 31. Juli |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)568914813 |w (DE-600)2429631-4 |w (DE-576)281703132 |x 1756-8722 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:31 |g month:07 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01465-x |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 31 |c 07 |