Agreement between low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest CT for the diagnosis of viral pneumonia imaging patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic
Background Chest CT scan has an important role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 infection. A major concern in radiologic assessment of the patients is the radiation dose. Research has been done to evaluate low-dose chest CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions with promising findings. We decided to determine diagnostic performance of ultra-low-dose chest CT in comparison to low-dose CT for viral pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 167 patients underwent both low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest CT scans. Two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis independently examined ultra-low-dose chest CT scans for findings consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia. In case of any disagreement, a third senior radiologist made the final diagnosis. Agreement between two CT protocols regarding ground-glass opacity, consolidation, reticulation, and nodular infiltration were recorded. On low-dose chest CT, 44 patients had findings consistent with COVID-19 infection. Ultra-low-dose chest CT had sensitivity and specificity values of 100% and 98.4%, respectively for diagnosis of viral pneumonia. Two patients were falsely categorized to have pneumonia on ultra-low-dose CT scan. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ultra-low-dose CT scan were respectively 95.7% and 100%. There was good agreement between low-dose and ultra-low-dose methods (kappa = 0.97; P < 0.001). Perfect agreement between low-dose and ultra-low-dose scans was found regarding diagnosis of ground-glass opacity (kappa = 0.83, P < 0.001), consolidation (kappa = 0.88, P < 0.001), reticulation (kappa = 0.82, P < 0.001), and nodular infiltration (kappa = 0.87, P < 0.001). Conclusion Ultra-low-dose chest CT scan is comparable to low-dose chest CT for detection of lung infiltration during the COVID-19 outbreak while maintaining less radiation dose. It can also be used instead of low-dose chest CT scan for patient triage in circumstances where rapid-abundant PCR tests are not available..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:53 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine - 53(2022), 1 vom: 05. Jan. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bahrami-Motlagh, Hooman [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2022 |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s43055-021-00689-6 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2128964849 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2128964849 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240402141832.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230505s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s43055-021-00689-6 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2128964849 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s43055-021-00689-6-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Bahrami-Motlagh, Hooman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Agreement between low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest CT for the diagnosis of viral pneumonia imaging patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2022 | ||
520 | |a Background Chest CT scan has an important role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 infection. A major concern in radiologic assessment of the patients is the radiation dose. Research has been done to evaluate low-dose chest CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions with promising findings. We decided to determine diagnostic performance of ultra-low-dose chest CT in comparison to low-dose CT for viral pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results 167 patients underwent both low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest CT scans. Two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis independently examined ultra-low-dose chest CT scans for findings consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia. In case of any disagreement, a third senior radiologist made the final diagnosis. Agreement between two CT protocols regarding ground-glass opacity, consolidation, reticulation, and nodular infiltration were recorded. On low-dose chest CT, 44 patients had findings consistent with COVID-19 infection. Ultra-low-dose chest CT had sensitivity and specificity values of 100% and 98.4%, respectively for diagnosis of viral pneumonia. Two patients were falsely categorized to have pneumonia on ultra-low-dose CT scan. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ultra-low-dose CT scan were respectively 95.7% and 100%. There was good agreement between low-dose and ultra-low-dose methods (kappa = 0.97; P < 0.001). Perfect agreement between low-dose and ultra-low-dose scans was found regarding diagnosis of ground-glass opacity (kappa = 0.83, P < 0.001), consolidation (kappa = 0.88, P < 0.001), reticulation (kappa = 0.82, P < 0.001), and nodular infiltration (kappa = 0.87, P < 0.001). Conclusion Ultra-low-dose chest CT scan is comparable to low-dose chest CT for detection of lung infiltration during the COVID-19 outbreak while maintaining less radiation dose. It can also be used instead of low-dose chest CT scan for patient triage in circumstances where rapid-abundant PCR tests are not available. | ||
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a Computerized tomography | |
650 | 4 | |a Ultra-low-dose | |
650 | 4 | |a Chest | |
700 | 1 | |a Moharamzad, Yashar |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Izadi Amoli, Golnaz |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abbasi, Sahar |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Abrishami, Alireza |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Khazaei, Mehdi |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7852-7951 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Davarpanah, Amir H. |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0950-6772 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sanei Taheri, Morteza |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8881-9058 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010 |g 53(2022), 1 vom: 05. Jan. |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)641391862 |w (DE-600)2583928-7 |w (DE-576)335273823 |x 2090-4762 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:05 |g month:01 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00689-6 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 53 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 05 |c 01 |