Infection control for third-party benefit: lessons from criminal justice
Abstract This article considers what can be learned regarding the ethical acceptability of intrusive interventions intended to halt the spread of infectious disease (‘Infection Control’ measures) from existing ethical discussion of intrusive interventions used to prevent criminal conduct (‘Crime Control’ measures). The main body of the article identifies and briefly describes six objections that have been advanced against Crime Control, and considers how these might apply to Infection Control. The final section then draws out some more general lessons from the foregoing analysis for the ethical acceptability of different kinds of Infection Control..
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Monash bioethics review - 38(2019), Suppl 1 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 17-31 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Douglas, Thomas [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [lizenzpflichtig] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Criminal justice ethics |
|---|
| RVK: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2019 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s40592-019-00103-y |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2122143266 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2122143266 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504192000.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230504s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s40592-019-00103-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2122143266 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s40592-019-00103-y-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |a 100 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a XA 62359.5 |q VZ |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Douglas, Thomas |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6788-3608 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Infection control for third-party benefit: lessons from criminal justice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2019 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract This article considers what can be learned regarding the ethical acceptability of intrusive interventions intended to halt the spread of infectious disease (‘Infection Control’ measures) from existing ethical discussion of intrusive interventions used to prevent criminal conduct (‘Crime Control’ measures). The main body of the article identifies and briefly describes six objections that have been advanced against Crime Control, and considers how these might apply to Infection Control. The final section then draws out some more general lessons from the foregoing analysis for the ethical acceptability of different kinds of Infection Control. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Public health ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infectious disease | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quarantine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vaccination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal justice ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Preventive detention | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Monash bioethics review |d Springer International Publishing, 1994 |g 38(2019), Suppl 1 vom: 12. Dez., Seite 17-31 |w (DE-627)19416862X |w (DE-600)1305250-0 |w (DE-576)051406462 |x 1321-2753 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2019 |g number:Suppl 1 |g day:12 |g month:12 |g pages:17-31 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-019-00103-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2002 | ||
| 936 | r | v | |a XA 62359.5 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 38 |j 2019 |e Suppl 1 |b 12 |c 12 |h 17-31 | ||