First prospective clinical evaluation of feasibility and patient acceptance of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in Germany
Purpose Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has recently been introduced in our institution. As MRgRT requires high patient compliance compared to conventional techniques and can be associated with prolonged treatment times, feasibility and patient tolerance were prospectively assessed using patient-reported outcome questionnaires (PRO-Q). Materials and methods Forty-three patients were enrolled in a prospective observational study and treated with MRgRT on a low-field hybrid Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerator system (MR-Linac) between April 2018 and April 2019. For assistance in gated breath-hold delivery using cine-MRI, a video feedback system was installed. PRO-Qs consisted of questions on MR-related complaints and also assessed aspects of active patient participation. Results The most commonly treated anatomic sites were nodal metastases and liver lesions. The mean treatment time was 34 min with a mean beam-on time of 2:17 min. Gated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was applied in 47% of all patients. Overall, patients scored MRgRT as positive or at least tolerable in the PRO‑Q. Almost two thirds of patients (65%) complained about at least one item of the PRO‑Q (score ≥4), mainly concerning coldness, paresthesia, and uncomfortable positioning. All patients reported high levels of satisfaction with their active role using the video feedback system in breath-hold delivery. Conclusion MRgRT was successfully implemented in our clinic and well tolerated by all patients, despite MR-related complaints and complaints about uncomfortable immobilization. Prospective clinical studies are in development for further evaluation of MRgRT and for quantification of the benefit of MR-guided on-table adaptive radiotherapy..
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:196 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie - 196(2020), 8 vom: 30. Jan., Seite 691-698 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Klüter, Sebastian [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [lizenzpflichtig] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Gating |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2020 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s00066-020-01578-z |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2118582625 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2118582625 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230504161259.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230504s2020 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00066-020-01578-z |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2118582625 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s00066-020-01578-z-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Klüter, Sebastian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a First prospective clinical evaluation of feasibility and patient acceptance of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in Germany |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2020 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has recently been introduced in our institution. As MRgRT requires high patient compliance compared to conventional techniques and can be associated with prolonged treatment times, feasibility and patient tolerance were prospectively assessed using patient-reported outcome questionnaires (PRO-Q). Materials and methods Forty-three patients were enrolled in a prospective observational study and treated with MRgRT on a low-field hybrid Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerator system (MR-Linac) between April 2018 and April 2019. For assistance in gated breath-hold delivery using cine-MRI, a video feedback system was installed. PRO-Qs consisted of questions on MR-related complaints and also assessed aspects of active patient participation. Results The most commonly treated anatomic sites were nodal metastases and liver lesions. The mean treatment time was 34 min with a mean beam-on time of 2:17 min. Gated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was applied in 47% of all patients. Overall, patients scored MRgRT as positive or at least tolerable in the PRO‑Q. Almost two thirds of patients (65%) complained about at least one item of the PRO‑Q (score ≥4), mainly concerning coldness, paresthesia, and uncomfortable positioning. All patients reported high levels of satisfaction with their active role using the video feedback system in breath-hold delivery. Conclusion MRgRT was successfully implemented in our clinic and well tolerated by all patients, despite MR-related complaints and complaints about uncomfortable immobilization. Prospective clinical studies are in development for further evaluation of MRgRT and for quantification of the benefit of MR-guided on-table adaptive radiotherapy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a MR-guided | |
| 650 | 4 | |a MR-Linac | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Implementation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gating | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patient acceptance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patient-reported outcomes | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Katayama, Sonja |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Spindeldreier, C. Katharina |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koerber, Stefan A. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Major, Gerald |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alber, Markus |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Akbaba, Sati |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Debus, Jürgen |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hörner-Rieber, Juliane |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Strahlentherapie und Onkologie |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986 |g 196(2020), 8 vom: 30. Jan., Seite 691-698 |w (DE-627)129275425 |w (DE-600)84983-2 |w (DE-576)014464403 |x 0179-7158 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:196 |g year:2020 |g number:8 |g day:30 |g month:01 |g pages:691-698 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01578-z |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2412 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 196 |j 2020 |e 8 |b 30 |c 01 |h 691-698 | ||