Cerebrospinal fluid in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: clinical utility of an extended panel of biomarkers in a specialist cognitive clinic

Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are increasingly being used to support a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Their clinical utility for differentiating AD from non-AD neurodegenerative dementias, such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) or frontotemporal dementia (FTD), is less well established. We aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of an extended panel of CSF biomarkers to differentiate AD from a range of other neurodegenerative dementias. Methods We used immunoassays to measure conventional CSF markers of amyloid and tau pathology (amyloid beta (Aβ)1–42, total tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau)) as well as amyloid processing (AβX-38, AβX-40, AβX-42, soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP)α, and sAPPβ), large fibre axonal degeneration (neurofilament light chain (NFL)), and neuroinflammation (YKL-40) in 245 patients with a variety of dementias and 30 controls. Patients fulfilled consensus criteria for AD (n = 156), DLB (n = 20), behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; n = 45), progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA; n = 17), and semantic dementia (SD; n = 7); approximately 10% were pathology/genetically confirmed (n = 26). Global tests based on generalised least squares regression were used to determine differences between groups. Non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to quantify how well each biomarker discriminated AD from each of the other diagnostic groups (or combinations of groups). CSF cut-points for the major biomarkers found to have diagnostic utility were validated using an independent cohort which included causes of AD (n = 104), DLB (n = 5), bvFTD (n = 12), PNFA (n = 3), SD (n = 9), and controls (n = 10). Results There were significant global differences in Aβ1–42, T-tau, T-tau/Aβ1–42 ratio, P-tau-181, NFL, AβX-42, AβX-42/X-40 ratio, APPα, and APPβ between groups. At a fixed sensitivity of 85%, AβX-42/X-40 could differentiate AD from controls, bvFTD, and SD with specificities of 93%, 85%, and 100%, respectively; for T-tau/Aβ1–42 these specificities were 83%, 70%, and 86%. AβX-42/X-40 had similar or higher specificity than Aβ1–42. No biomarker or ratio could differentiate AD from DLB or PNFA with specificity > 50%. Similar sensitivities and specificities were found in the independent validation cohort for differentiating AD and other dementias and in a pathology/genetically confirmed sub-cohort. Conclusions CSF AβX-42/X-40 and T-tau/Aβ1–42 ratios have utility in distinguishing AD from controls, bvFTD, and SD. None of the biomarkers tested had good specificity at distinguishing AD from DLB or PNFA..

Medienart:	E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:	2018
Erschienen:	2018

Enthalten in:	Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10
Enthalten in:	Alzheimer's research & therapy - 10(2018), 1 vom: 20. März

Sprache:	Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Paterson, Ross W. [VerfasserIn] Slattery, Catherine F. [VerfasserIn] Poole, Teresa [VerfasserIn] Nicholas, Jennifer M. [VerfasserIn] Magdalinou, Nadia K. [VerfasserIn] Toombs, Jamie [VerfasserIn] Chapman, Miles D. [VerfasserIn] Lunn, Michael P. [VerfasserIn] Heslegrave, Amanda J. [VerfasserIn] Foiani, Martha S [VerfasserIn] Weston, Philip S. J. [VerfasserIn] Keshavan, Ashvini [VerfasserIn] Rohrer, Jonathan D. [VerfasserIn] Rossor, Martin N. [VerfasserIn] Warren, Jason D. [VerfasserIn] Mummery, Catherine J. [VerfasserIn] Blennow, Kaj [VerfasserIn] Fox, Nick C. [VerfasserIn] Zetterberg, Henrik [VerfasserIn] Schott, Jonathan M. [VerfasserIn]

Links:	Volltext [kostenfrei]

Themen:	Alzheimer’s disease Biomarkers Cerebrospinal fluid Differential diagnosis

Anmerkungen:	© The Author(s). 2018

doi:	10.1186/s13195-018-0361-3

funding:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	OLC2097132219