What information can the lay public find about osteoporosis treatment? A descriptive study coding the content and quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet

Summary Despite its effectiveness, bisphosphonate use for osteoporosis is low. We assessed bisphosphonate information on the internet and found the most commonly listed benefits/risks were bone density loss, gastrointestinal issues, and jaw necrosis, that risk quantification was rare, and information quality varied. Findings underscore the importance of clinical communication about bisphosphonates. Introduction The US Preventative Services Task Force recommends osteoporosis screening and treatment with bisphosphonates in high-risk populations. However, bisphosphonate use among individuals with osteoporosis remains low. The content and quality of information from outside sources may influence individuals’ bisphosphonate decisions. Therefore, we sought to assess the content and quality of osteoporosis treatment information available to the public by conducting an internet search and coding available bisphosphonate information. Methods Eleven search terms about osteoporosis and bisphosphonates were entered into four search engines. Two raters assessed websites for information about bisphosphonates, whether and how benefits and side effects were described and quantified, contraindications, and dosing instructions. Coders also assessed website interface and slant/balance of information. Results One thousand four hundred seventy-three websites were identified. Two hundred twenty-seven websites met inclusion criteria and were coded. The most common bisphosphonate benefit described was prevention of bone density loss (77.1% of websites). The most common side effects described were gastrointestinal problems (66.1%) and jaw osteonecrosis (58.6%). Most websites did not quantify bisphosphonate benefits (78.0%) or side effects (82.4%). Complementary/integrative health websites (p < .001) and pharmaceutical litigation websites (p < .001) were more often slanted against taking bisphosphonates, compared to all websites coded. General medical knowledge websites were more balanced than other websites (p = .023). Conclusions The quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet varies substantially. Providers counseling patients about osteoporosis treatment should inquire about patients’ baseline bisphosphonate knowledge. Providers can complement accurate information and address potential bisphosphonate misconceptions..

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2019

Erschienen:

2019

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30

Enthalten in:

Osteoporosis international - 30(2019), 11 vom: 11. Juli, Seite 2299-2310

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Fuzzell, L. N. [VerfasserIn]
Richards, M. J. [VerfasserIn]
Fraenkel, L. [VerfasserIn]
Stark, S. L. [VerfasserIn]
Politi, M. C. [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext [lizenzpflichtig]

Themen:

Bisphosphonates
Health communication
Online information
Osteoporosis

Anmerkungen:

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019

doi:

10.1007/s00198-019-05008-4

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

OLC2082972496

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit




Zugehörige Publikationen/Bände

    Haven't found what you're looking for?