Using a smartphone on the move: do visual constraints explain why we slow walking speed?
Abstract Viewing one’s smartphone whilst walking commonly leads to a slowing of walking. Slowing walking speed may occur because of the visual constraints related to reading the hand-held phone whilst in motion. We determine how walking-induced phone motion affects the ability to read on-screen information. Phone-reading performance (PRP) was assessed whilst participants walked on a treadmill at various speeds (Slow, Customary, Fast). The fastest speed was repeated, wearing an elbow brace (Braced) or with the phone mounted stationary (Fixed). An audible cue (‘text-alert’) indicated participants had 2 s to lift/view the phone and read aloud a series of digits. PRP was the number of digits read correctly. Each condition was repeated 5 times. 3D-motion analyses determined phone motion relative to the head, from which the variability in acceleration in viewing distance, and in the point of gaze in space in the up-down and right-left directions were assessed. A main effect of condition indicated PRP decreased with walking speed; particularly so for the Braced and Fixed conditions (p = 0.022). Walking condition also affected the phone’s relative motion (p < 0.001); post-hoc analysis indicated that acceleration variability for the Fast, Fixed and Braced conditions were increased compared to that for Slow and Customary speed walking (p ≤ 0.05). There was an inverse association between phone acceleration variability and PRP (p = 0.02). These findings may explain why walking speed slows when viewing a hand-held phone: at slower speeds, head motion is smoother/more regular, enabling the motion of the phone to be coupled with head motion, thus making fewer demands on the oculomotor system. Good coupling ensures that the retinal image is stable enough to allow legibility of the information presented on the screen..
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:240 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Experimental brain research - 240(2021), 2 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 467-480 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Rubio Barañano, Alejandro [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [lizenzpflichtig] |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
© The Author(s) 2021 |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00221-021-06267-6 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2078084956 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2078084956 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230509180243.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 221220s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00221-021-06267-6 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2078084956 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s00221-021-06267-6-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Rubio Barañano, Alejandro |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-3730-2737 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Using a smartphone on the move: do visual constraints explain why we slow walking speed? |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2021 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Viewing one’s smartphone whilst walking commonly leads to a slowing of walking. Slowing walking speed may occur because of the visual constraints related to reading the hand-held phone whilst in motion. We determine how walking-induced phone motion affects the ability to read on-screen information. Phone-reading performance (PRP) was assessed whilst participants walked on a treadmill at various speeds (Slow, Customary, Fast). The fastest speed was repeated, wearing an elbow brace (Braced) or with the phone mounted stationary (Fixed). An audible cue (‘text-alert’) indicated participants had 2 s to lift/view the phone and read aloud a series of digits. PRP was the number of digits read correctly. Each condition was repeated 5 times. 3D-motion analyses determined phone motion relative to the head, from which the variability in acceleration in viewing distance, and in the point of gaze in space in the up-down and right-left directions were assessed. A main effect of condition indicated PRP decreased with walking speed; particularly so for the Braced and Fixed conditions (p = 0.022). Walking condition also affected the phone’s relative motion (p < 0.001); post-hoc analysis indicated that acceleration variability for the Fast, Fixed and Braced conditions were increased compared to that for Slow and Customary speed walking (p ≤ 0.05). There was an inverse association between phone acceleration variability and PRP (p = 0.02). These findings may explain why walking speed slows when viewing a hand-held phone: at slower speeds, head motion is smoother/more regular, enabling the motion of the phone to be coupled with head motion, thus making fewer demands on the oculomotor system. Good coupling ensures that the retinal image is stable enough to allow legibility of the information presented on the screen. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Smart-phone | |
650 | 4 | |a Reading performance | |
650 | 4 | |a Head motion | |
650 | 4 | |a Vision | |
650 | 4 | |a Walking | |
700 | 1 | |a Faisal, Muhammad |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4885-4251 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Barrett, Brendan T. |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4159-4223 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Buckley, John G. |0 (orcid)0000-0002-4085-4743 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Experimental brain research |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1966 |g 240(2021), 2 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 467-480 |w (DE-627)129066265 |w (DE-600)1201-4 |w (DE-576)014397552 |x 0014-4819 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:240 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g day:18 |g month:11 |g pages:467-480 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06267-6 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 240 |j 2021 |e 2 |b 18 |c 11 |h 467-480 |