Multi-model comparison on the effects of climate change on tree species in the eastern U.S.: results from an enhanced niche model and process-based ecosystem and landscape models
Context Species distribution models (SDM) establish statistical relationships between the current distribution of species and key attributes whereas process-based models simulate ecosystem and tree species dynamics based on representations of physical and biological processes. TreeAtlas, which uses DISTRIB SDM, and Linkages and LANDIS PRO, process-based ecosystem and landscape models, respectively, were used concurrently on four regional climate change assessments in the eastern Unites States. Objectives We compared predictions for 30 species from TreeAtlas, Linkages, and LANDIS PRO, using two climate change scenarios on four regions, to derive a more robust assessment of species change in response to climate change. Methods We calculated the ratio of future importance or biomass to current for each species, then compared agreement among models by species, region, and climate scenario using change classes, an ordinal agreement score, spearman rank correlations, and model averaged change ratios. Results Comparisons indicated high agreement for many species, especially northern species modeled to lose habitat. TreeAtlas and Linkages agreed the most but each also agreed with many species outputs from LANDIS PRO, particularly when succession within LANDIS PRO was simulated to 2300. A geographic analysis showed that a simple difference (in latitude degrees) of the weighted mean center of a species distribution versus the geographic center of the region of interest provides an initial estimate for the species’ potential to gain, lose, or remain stable under climate change. Conclusions This analysis of multiple models provides a useful approach to compare among disparate models and a more consistent interpretation of the future for use in vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning..
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:32 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Landscape ecology - 32(2016), 7 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 1327-1346 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Iverson, Louis R. [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
Volltext [lizenzpflichtig] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Climate change |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht(outside the USA) 2016 |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s10980-016-0404-8 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2075238022 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC2075238022 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503171245.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10980-016-0404-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2075238022 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-He213)s10980-016-0404-8-p | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |a 910 |a 630 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 12 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Iverson, Louis R. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9501-471X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Multi-model comparison on the effects of climate change on tree species in the eastern U.S.: results from an enhanced niche model and process-based ecosystem and landscape models |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht(outside the USA) 2016 | ||
| 520 | |a Context Species distribution models (SDM) establish statistical relationships between the current distribution of species and key attributes whereas process-based models simulate ecosystem and tree species dynamics based on representations of physical and biological processes. TreeAtlas, which uses DISTRIB SDM, and Linkages and LANDIS PRO, process-based ecosystem and landscape models, respectively, were used concurrently on four regional climate change assessments in the eastern Unites States. Objectives We compared predictions for 30 species from TreeAtlas, Linkages, and LANDIS PRO, using two climate change scenarios on four regions, to derive a more robust assessment of species change in response to climate change. Methods We calculated the ratio of future importance or biomass to current for each species, then compared agreement among models by species, region, and climate scenario using change classes, an ordinal agreement score, spearman rank correlations, and model averaged change ratios. Results Comparisons indicated high agreement for many species, especially northern species modeled to lose habitat. TreeAtlas and Linkages agreed the most but each also agreed with many species outputs from LANDIS PRO, particularly when succession within LANDIS PRO was simulated to 2300. A geographic analysis showed that a simple difference (in latitude degrees) of the weighted mean center of a species distribution versus the geographic center of the region of interest provides an initial estimate for the species’ potential to gain, lose, or remain stable under climate change. Conclusions This analysis of multiple models provides a useful approach to compare among disparate models and a more consistent interpretation of the future for use in vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Climate change | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Eastern United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Multi-model comparison | |
| 650 | 4 | |a TreeAtlas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a DISTRIB | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LANDIS PRO | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Linkages | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forests | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thompson, Frank R. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Matthews, Stephen |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Peters, Matthew |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Prasad, Anantha |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dijak, William D. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fraser, Jacob |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Wen J. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hanberry, Brice |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a He, Hong |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Janowiak, Maria |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Butler, Patricia |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Brandt, Leslie |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Swanston, Christopher |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Landscape ecology |d Springer Netherlands, 1987 |g 32(2016), 7 vom: 22. Juni, Seite 1327-1346 |w (DE-627)130857424 |w (DE-600)1027798-5 |w (DE-576)052841901 |x 0921-2973 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2016 |g number:7 |g day:22 |g month:06 |g pages:1327-1346 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0404-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ARC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-FOR | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 32 |j 2016 |e 7 |b 22 |c 06 |h 1327-1346 | ||