Monoallelic CEBPA mutations in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia: independent favorable prognostic factor within NPM1 mutated patients
Abstract We and others have shown that cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML patients with biallelic CEBPA gene mutations (biCEBPA) represent a molecularly distinct group with a favorable prognosis. Patients carrying a monoallelic CEBPA mutation (moCEBPA), however, show no different outcome compared to patients with wildtype CEBPA, and these mutations are frequently associated with mutated NPM1 or FLT3-ITD. So far, no molecular or clinical hallmark has been identified to prognostically distinguish moCEBPA patients from patients with wildtype CEBPA. Therefore, we used the data of 663 CN-AML patients treated within the AMLCG 1999 trial to explore the prognostic value of moCEBPA in the context of concomitant clinical and molecular markers (mutated NPM1, FLT3-ITD). Multiple Cox regression in 515 patients adjusting for all available potential confounders revealed that the NPM1 mutation modified the prognostic value of moCEBPA with respect to overall survival (OS, p = 0.017) and event-free survival (EFS, p = 0.011). MoCEBPA was beneficial in NPM1 mutated patients: adjusted OS–hazard ratio (HR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.63, p = 0.016; EFS–HR (95% CI) 0.16 (0.04–0.65), p = 0.010. In contrast, moCEBPA had no prognostic impact in patients with wildtype NPM1: OS–HR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.59–1.97), p = 0.804; EFS–HR (95% CI) 1.12 (0.64–1.96), p = 0.682. We found no prognostic effect modification for moCEBPA by FLT3-ITD. The presence of a moCEBPA mutation was shown to be associated with prolonged survival in NPM1 mutated CN-AML patients. Confirmation of these results in larger studies will clarify whether an additional moCEBPA mutation influences the risk stratification of patients with an NPM1 mutated/FLT3-ITD positive genotype..
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2012 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2012 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:91 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Annals of hematology - 91(2012), 7 vom: 24. Feb., Seite 1051-1063 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Dufour, Annika [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [lizenzpflichtig] |
---|
Themen: |
Acute myeloid leukemia |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
© Springer-Verlag 2012 |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00277-012-1423-4 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC2045513416 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC2045513416 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230518045411.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 200819s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00277-012-1423-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC2045513416 | ||
035 | |a (DE-He213)s00277-012-1423-4-p | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Dufour, Annika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monoallelic CEBPA mutations in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia: independent favorable prognostic factor within NPM1 mutated patients |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Springer-Verlag 2012 | ||
520 | |a Abstract We and others have shown that cytogenetically normal (CN)-AML patients with biallelic CEBPA gene mutations (biCEBPA) represent a molecularly distinct group with a favorable prognosis. Patients carrying a monoallelic CEBPA mutation (moCEBPA), however, show no different outcome compared to patients with wildtype CEBPA, and these mutations are frequently associated with mutated NPM1 or FLT3-ITD. So far, no molecular or clinical hallmark has been identified to prognostically distinguish moCEBPA patients from patients with wildtype CEBPA. Therefore, we used the data of 663 CN-AML patients treated within the AMLCG 1999 trial to explore the prognostic value of moCEBPA in the context of concomitant clinical and molecular markers (mutated NPM1, FLT3-ITD). Multiple Cox regression in 515 patients adjusting for all available potential confounders revealed that the NPM1 mutation modified the prognostic value of moCEBPA with respect to overall survival (OS, p = 0.017) and event-free survival (EFS, p = 0.011). MoCEBPA was beneficial in NPM1 mutated patients: adjusted OS–hazard ratio (HR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.63, p = 0.016; EFS–HR (95% CI) 0.16 (0.04–0.65), p = 0.010. In contrast, moCEBPA had no prognostic impact in patients with wildtype NPM1: OS–HR (95% CI) 1.08 (0.59–1.97), p = 0.804; EFS–HR (95% CI) 1.12 (0.64–1.96), p = 0.682. We found no prognostic effect modification for moCEBPA by FLT3-ITD. The presence of a moCEBPA mutation was shown to be associated with prolonged survival in NPM1 mutated CN-AML patients. Confirmation of these results in larger studies will clarify whether an additional moCEBPA mutation influences the risk stratification of patients with an NPM1 mutated/FLT3-ITD positive genotype. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Monoallelic | |
650 | 4 | |a mutations | |
650 | 4 | |a mutation | |
650 | 4 | |a Normal karyotype | |
650 | 4 | |a Acute myeloid leukemia | |
700 | 1 | |a Schneider, Friederike |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hoster, Eva |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Benthaus, Tobias |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ksienzyk, Bianka |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Schneider, Stephanie |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kakadia, Purvi M. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sauerland, Maria-Cristina |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Berdel, Wolfgang E. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Büchner, Thomas |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wörmann, Bernhard |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Braess, Jan |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Subklewe, Marion |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hiddemann, Wolfgang |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bohlander, Stefan K. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Spiekermann, Karsten |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of hematology |d Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991 |g 91(2012), 7 vom: 24. Feb., Seite 1051-1063 |w (DE-627)130956759 |w (DE-600)1064950-5 |w (DE-576)025101188 |x 0939-5555 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:91 |g year:2012 |g number:7 |g day:24 |g month:02 |g pages:1051-1063 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-012-1423-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 91 |j 2012 |e 7 |b 24 |c 02 |h 1051-1063 |