Adherence to Cardiac Practice Guidelines in the Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Literature Review
Background: In the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTACS) a gap between guideline-recommended care and actual practice has been reported. A systematic overview of the actual extent of this gap, its potential impact on patient-outcomes, and influential factors is lacking. Objective: To examine the extent of guideline adherence, to study associations with the occurrence of adverse cardiac events, and to identify factors associated with guideline adherence. Method: Systematic literature review, for which PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library were searched until March 2016. Further, a manual search was performed using reference lists of included studies. Two reviewers independently performed quality-assessment and data extraction of the eligible studies. Results: Adherence rates varied widely within and between 45 eligible studies, ranging from less than 5.0 % to more than 95.0 % for recommendations on acute and discharge pharmacological treatment, 34.3 % - 93.0 % for risk stratification, and 16.0 % - 95.8 % for performing coronary angiography. Seven studies indicated that higher adherence rates were associated with lower mortality. Several patient-related (e.g. age, gender, co-morbidities) and organization-related (e.g. teaching hospital) factors influencing adherence were identified. Conclusion: This review showed wide variation in guideline adherence, with a substantial proportion of NST-ACS patients possibly not receiving guideline-recommended care. Consequently, lower adherence might be associated with a higher risk for poor prognosis. Future research should further investigate the complex nature of guideline adherence in NST-ACS, its impact on clinical care, and factors influencing adherence. This knowledge is essential to optimize clinical management of NSTACS patients and could guide future quality improvement initiatives..
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Current cardiology reviews - 13(2017), 1, Seite 3-27 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Josien Engel [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC1991584202 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1991584202 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230508131534.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 170303s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170301 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1991584202 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1991584202 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)b1520-cbfffd260bc8af6e53a6b4b0ac7dd34b39fd8485cbbb5289da6c9c84f3d1fefc0 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0574726020170000013000100003adherencetocardiacpracticeguidelinesinthemanagemen | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ZDB |
| 100 | 0 | |a Josien Engel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Adherence to Cardiac Practice Guidelines in the Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Literature Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background: In the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTACS) a gap between guideline-recommended care and actual practice has been reported. A systematic overview of the actual extent of this gap, its potential impact on patient-outcomes, and influential factors is lacking. Objective: To examine the extent of guideline adherence, to study associations with the occurrence of adverse cardiac events, and to identify factors associated with guideline adherence. Method: Systematic literature review, for which PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library were searched until March 2016. Further, a manual search was performed using reference lists of included studies. Two reviewers independently performed quality-assessment and data extraction of the eligible studies. Results: Adherence rates varied widely within and between 45 eligible studies, ranging from less than 5.0 % to more than 95.0 % for recommendations on acute and discharge pharmacological treatment, 34.3 % - 93.0 % for risk stratification, and 16.0 % - 95.8 % for performing coronary angiography. Seven studies indicated that higher adherence rates were associated with lower mortality. Several patient-related (e.g. age, gender, co-morbidities) and organization-related (e.g. teaching hospital) factors influencing adherence were identified. Conclusion: This review showed wide variation in guideline adherence, with a substantial proportion of NST-ACS patients possibly not receiving guideline-recommended care. Consequently, lower adherence might be associated with a higher risk for poor prognosis. Future research should further investigate the complex nature of guideline adherence in NST-ACS, its impact on clinical care, and factors influencing adherence. This knowledge is essential to optimize clinical management of NSTACS patients and could guide future quality improvement initiatives. | ||
| 700 | 0 | |a Nikki L. Damen |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ineke van der Wulp |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Martine C. de Bruijne |4 oth | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Cordula Wagner |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Current cardiology reviews |d Sharjah [u.a.] : Bentham Science Publishers, 2005 |g 13(2017), 1, Seite 3-27 |w (DE-627)528856944 |w (DE-600)2296217-7 |x 1573-403X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:3-27 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.eurekaselect.com/openurl/content.php?genre=article&issn=1573-403X&volume=13&issue=1&spage=3 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 13 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 3-27 | ||