Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography: a new method comparable to acoustic radiation force impulse imaging?
OBJECTIVESTwo-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) is an ultrasound-based technique for the noninvasive assessment of tissue stiffness. In contrast to the well-established point-shear-wave elastography (pSWE) method acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, there is little evidence on the performance and usefulness of 2D-SWE in the assessment of liver stiffness. Thus, the aim of our study was to compare 2D-SWE versus pSWE. MATERIALS AND METHODS2D-SWE and pSWE were performed in 20 cirrhotic patients, 20 healthy individuals and an elasticity phantom. Stiffness values, examination time and number of measurements were compared. For 2D-SWE, the influence of size of the region of interest (ROI) was assessed. RESULTSElastography values in healthy individuals were slightly higher for 2D-SWE versus pSWE (1.4 m/s, range1.21–1.68 vs. 1.23 m/s, range1.07–1.39). In cirrhotic patients, there were no significant differences (3.06 m/s, range1.83–5.35 vs. 3 m/s, range1.67–4.37 m/s). Examination times were significantly longer for 2D-SWE in both patient groups (mean values for healthy/cirrhotic patients129.6/157.1 vs. 75/71.6 s). For 2D-SWE, variation of ROI size (5, 10, 20 mm) produced comparable results. After eight measurements, 90% of cirrhotic patients showed less than 5% of deviation from the results after the gold standard of 10 measurements; for healthy individuals, this was observed after six measurements. CONCLUSION2D-SWE seems to be comparable to pSWE (acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging) in cirrhotic patients, with slightly higher values in healthy individuals. 2D-SWE measurements require considerably more time. For 2D-SWE, ROI size seems to be of minor importance; multiple measurements should be obtained as single measurements differ. These preliminary results should be confirmed in larger patient collectives with histology as the reference standard..
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2017 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology - (2017), Seite 1 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Schellhaas, Barbara [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
BKL: |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/MEG.0000000000000846 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC1989138292 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1989138292 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230516182656.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000846 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170206 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1989138292 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1989138292 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c946-aff10291a7be2c28ad905fc8f2d909be8b602ee7c83313070c2576d9961c077b0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0180792720170000000000000001twodimensionalshearwaveelastographyanewmethodcompa | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 44.87 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schellhaas, Barbara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Two-dimensional shear-wave elastography: a new method comparable to acoustic radiation force impulse imaging? |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVESTwo-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) is an ultrasound-based technique for the noninvasive assessment of tissue stiffness. In contrast to the well-established point-shear-wave elastography (pSWE) method acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, there is little evidence on the performance and usefulness of 2D-SWE in the assessment of liver stiffness. Thus, the aim of our study was to compare 2D-SWE versus pSWE. MATERIALS AND METHODS2D-SWE and pSWE were performed in 20 cirrhotic patients, 20 healthy individuals and an elasticity phantom. Stiffness values, examination time and number of measurements were compared. For 2D-SWE, the influence of size of the region of interest (ROI) was assessed. RESULTSElastography values in healthy individuals were slightly higher for 2D-SWE versus pSWE (1.4 m/s, range1.21–1.68 vs. 1.23 m/s, range1.07–1.39). In cirrhotic patients, there were no significant differences (3.06 m/s, range1.83–5.35 vs. 3 m/s, range1.67–4.37 m/s). Examination times were significantly longer for 2D-SWE in both patient groups (mean values for healthy/cirrhotic patients129.6/157.1 vs. 75/71.6 s). For 2D-SWE, variation of ROI size (5, 10, 20 mm) produced comparable results. After eight measurements, 90% of cirrhotic patients showed less than 5% of deviation from the results after the gold standard of 10 measurements; for healthy individuals, this was observed after six measurements. CONCLUSION2D-SWE seems to be comparable to pSWE (acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging) in cirrhotic patients, with slightly higher values in healthy individuals. 2D-SWE measurements require considerably more time. For 2D-SWE, ROI size seems to be of minor importance; multiple measurements should be obtained as single measurements differ. These preliminary results should be confirmed in larger patient collectives with histology as the reference standard. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Strobel, Deike |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wildner, Dane |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Goertz, Ruediger S |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Neurath, Markus F |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pfeifer, Lukas |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology |d Hagerstown, Md. : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1989 |g (2017), Seite 1 |w (DE-627)170274918 |w (DE-600)1034239-4 |w (DE-576)02508528X |x 0954-691X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2017 |g pages:1 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000846 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 44.87 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2017 |h 1 |