Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted
The production of systematic reviews is increasing, but their credibility is under threat. Although systematic reviews are an important tool for policymaking, their influence can be weakened by methodological problems and poor policy relevance. Using Cochrane as an example, I address standards for systematic reviews, the influence of special interests on these reviews, and ways to increase their relevance for policymakers..
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:107 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
AJPH - 107(2017), 1, Seite 93-96 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bero, Lisa [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
BKL: | |
---|---|
Themen: |
RVK: |
---|
doi: |
10.2105/AJPH.2016.303518 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC1988142873 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1988142873 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230517060930.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 170207s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303518 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20170206 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1988142873 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1988142873 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c957-5a1900f092596c9d6ad96de0fac13f3e261c15fc083514608d461d97793c2b230 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0074575820170000107000100093systematicreviewamethodatriskforbeingcorrupted | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DNB |
084 | |a XA 10000 |q AVZ |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 44.10 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bero, Lisa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The production of systematic reviews is increasing, but their credibility is under threat. Although systematic reviews are an important tool for policymaking, their influence can be weakened by methodological problems and poor policy relevance. Using Cochrane as an example, I address standards for systematic reviews, the influence of special interests on these reviews, and ways to increase their relevance for policymakers. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: © COPYRIGHT 2017 American Public Health Association, Inc. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Influence | |
650 | 4 | |a Policy sciences | |
650 | 4 | |a Pressure groups | |
650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t AJPH |d Washington, DC : APHA, 1911 |g 107(2017), 1, Seite 93-96 |w (DE-627)129295396 |w (DE-600)121100-6 |w (DE-576)014488671 |x 0090-0036 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:107 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:93-96 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303518 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | r | v | |a XA 10000 |
936 | b | k | |a 44.10 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 107 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 93-96 |