Pre- and post-procedural quality indicators for colonoscopy: A nationwide survey
The provision of high-quality colonoscopy can be assessed by evaluating technical aspects of the procedure and, at individual center level, by comparing structural indicators and institutional policies for managing peri-procedural issues with guideline recommendations. To assess the colonoscopy quality (CQ) in Italy at center level. Gastroenterologists participating in a nationwide colonoscopy education initiative provided information on structural indicators of their centers and on institutional policies by answering 10 multiple-choice clinical scenarios. Practice variation across centers and compliance with guidelines were analyzed. Data from 282 Italian centers were evaluated. Overall, a significant proportion of centers did not meet CQ standards as concerns endoscopy facilities and equipments (e.g., dedicated recovery room, dirty-to-clean path, reporting software). CQ assurance programs were implemented in only 25% of centers. Concerning peri-procedural issues, main discrepancies with guidelines were recorded in the underuse of split-dose preparation (routinely adopted by 18% of centers), the routine request of coagulation tests prior to colonoscopy (30%), the routine interruption of aspirin for polypectomy (18%), and the adoption of 3-year surveillance for low-risk adenoma (49%). Present survey shows a significant variation in the CQ of endoscopy centers in Italy on many items of colonoscopy practice that should be targeted for future interventions..
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2016 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:48 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Digestive and liver disease - 48(2016), 7, Seite 759-764 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Paggi, Silvia [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
BKL: |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.017 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC1978899416 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | OLC1978899416 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230514003120.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160720s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.017 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20161012 |
035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1978899416 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1978899416 | ||
035 | |a (PRQ)c1250-99e8dcbe81154f4d755a1091f04ff22ae9798dd353c5f70a5a0b49b1ae037e7a0 | ||
035 | |a (KEY)0040203620160000048000700759preandpostproceduralqualityindicatorsforcolonoscop | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ZDB |
084 | |a 44.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Paggi, Silvia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pre- and post-procedural quality indicators for colonoscopy: A nationwide survey |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The provision of high-quality colonoscopy can be assessed by evaluating technical aspects of the procedure and, at individual center level, by comparing structural indicators and institutional policies for managing peri-procedural issues with guideline recommendations. To assess the colonoscopy quality (CQ) in Italy at center level. Gastroenterologists participating in a nationwide colonoscopy education initiative provided information on structural indicators of their centers and on institutional policies by answering 10 multiple-choice clinical scenarios. Practice variation across centers and compliance with guidelines were analyzed. Data from 282 Italian centers were evaluated. Overall, a significant proportion of centers did not meet CQ standards as concerns endoscopy facilities and equipments (e.g., dedicated recovery room, dirty-to-clean path, reporting software). CQ assurance programs were implemented in only 25% of centers. Concerning peri-procedural issues, main discrepancies with guidelines were recorded in the underuse of split-dose preparation (routinely adopted by 18% of centers), the routine request of coagulation tests prior to colonoscopy (30%), the routine interruption of aspirin for polypectomy (18%), and the adoption of 3-year surveillance for low-risk adenoma (49%). Present survey shows a significant variation in the CQ of endoscopy centers in Italy on many items of colonoscopy practice that should be targeted for future interventions. | ||
540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Amato, Arnaldo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Anderloni, Andrea |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Annese, Vito |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Barresi, Luca |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Buda, Andrea |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Cesaro, Paola |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Di Giulio, Emilio |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Gullotti, Giuseppe |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fabbri, Carlo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fiori, Giancarla |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fuccio, Lorenzo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Manno, Mauro |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Musso, Alessandro |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Rondonotti, Emanuele |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Trovato, Cristina |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hassan, Cesare |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Repici, Alessandro |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Radaelli, Franco |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Digestive and liver disease |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2000 |g 48(2016), 7, Seite 759-764 |w (DE-627)333032705 |w (DE-600)2054970-2 |w (DE-576)286474042 |x 1590-8658 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2016 |g number:7 |g pages:759-764 |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.017 |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27116930 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-DE-84 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 44.00 |q AVZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 48 |j 2016 |e 7 |h 759-764 |