Controversies in Lung Cancer Screening
There remains an extensive debate over lung cancer screening, with lobbying for and against screening for very compelling reasons. The National Lung Screening Trial, International Early Lung Cancer Program, and other major screening studies favor screening with low-dose CT scans and have shown a reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality. The increasing incidence of lung cancer and the dismal survival rate for advanced disease despite improved multimodality therapy have sparked an interest in the implementation of national lung cancer screening. Concerns over imaging workflow, radiation dose, management of small nodules, overdiagnosis bias, lead-time and length-time bias, emerging new technologies, and cost-effectiveness continue to be debated. The authors address each of these issues as they relate to radiologic practice..
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of the American College of Radiology - 13(2016), 2 Suppl, Seite R2 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gill, Ritu R [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC1972271911 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1972271911 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211208211249.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160308s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160430 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1972271911 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1972271911 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)pubmed_primary_268465310 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0552963820160000013000200002controversiesinlungcancerscreening | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q ZDB |
| 100 | 1 | |a Gill, Ritu R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Controversies in Lung Cancer Screening |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a There remains an extensive debate over lung cancer screening, with lobbying for and against screening for very compelling reasons. The National Lung Screening Trial, International Early Lung Cancer Program, and other major screening studies favor screening with low-dose CT scans and have shown a reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality. The increasing incidence of lung cancer and the dismal survival rate for advanced disease despite improved multimodality therapy have sparked an interest in the implementation of national lung cancer screening. Concerns over imaging workflow, radiation dose, management of small nodules, overdiagnosis bias, lead-time and length-time bias, emerging new technologies, and cost-effectiveness continue to be debated. The authors address each of these issues as they relate to radiologic practice. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Jaklitsch, Michael T |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jacobson, Francine L |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American College of Radiology ; ID: gnd/1047485-7 |t Journal of the American College of Radiology |d New York, NY : Elsevier, 2004 |g 13(2016), 2 Suppl, Seite R2 |w (DE-627)527564117 |w (DE-600)2274861-1 |x 1546-1440 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2016 |g number:2 Suppl |g pages:R2 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846531 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 13 |j 2016 |e 2 Suppl |h R2 | ||