A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision
Herein, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of Shang Ring circumcision (SRC) with conventional circumcision (CC) for male patients. Articles were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Overall, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 3314 patients were included. Compared with the CC group, SRC is associated with shorter operative time, lower intraoperative pain score, higher satisfaction with penile appearances, less intraoperative blood loss, lower adverse event rate, and lower wound bleeding rate. SRC appears to be a safer and more effective choice in comparison with CC for male patients..
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2015 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:85 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Urology - 85(2015), 4, Seite 799 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Cao, Dehong [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| BKL: | |
|---|---|
| Themen: |
Circumcision, Male - adverse effects |
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
OLC1967231974 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1967231974 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220223070814.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1967231974 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1967231974 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)p1074-c362a340fe375a25c9f222b7b50a61b53e97eee3788642f7d432a4e39da6b9330 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0070551920150000085000400799systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcircumcisionwiths | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 44.88 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cao, Dehong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Herein, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of Shang Ring circumcision (SRC) with conventional circumcision (CC) for male patients. Articles were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Overall, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 3314 patients were included. Compared with the CC group, SRC is associated with shorter operative time, lower intraoperative pain score, higher satisfaction with penile appearances, less intraoperative blood loss, lower adverse event rate, and lower wound bleeding rate. SRC appears to be a safer and more effective choice in comparison with CC for male patients. | ||
| 540 | |a Nutzungsrecht: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Circumcision, Male - instrumentation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Circumcision, Male - adverse effects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Circumcision, Male - methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intraoperative Complications - etiology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pain - etiology | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Liangren |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hu, Yingchun |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Jia |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yuan, Jiuhong |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dong, Qiang |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wei, Qiang |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Urology |d New York, NY : Elsevier Science Inc., 1973 |g 85(2015), 4, Seite 799 |w (DE-627)129428590 |w (DE-600)192062-5 |w (DE-576)014801760 |x 0090-4295 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:85 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:799 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25711156 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4219 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.88 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 85 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 799 | ||