Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section
© 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
The accurate assessment of wound healing post-caesarean section, especially in twin pregnancies, remains a pivotal concern in obstetrics, given its implications for maternal health and recovery. Traditional methods, including conventional abdominal ultrasonography (CU), have been challenged by the advent of transvaginal ultrasonography (TU), offering potentially enhanced sensitivity and specificity. This meta-analysis directly compares the efficacy of TU and CU in evaluating wound healing and scar formation, crucial for optimizing postoperative care. Results indicate that TU is associated with significantly better outcomes in wound healing, demonstrated by lower REEDA scores (SMD = -20.56, 95% CI: [-27.34.20, -13.77], p < 0.01), and in scar formation reduction, evidenced by lower Manchester Scar Scale scores (SMD = -25.18, 95% CI: [-29.98, -20.39], p < 0.01). These findings underscore the potential of integrating TU into routine post-caesarean evaluation protocols to enhance care quality and patient recovery.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International wound journal - 21(2024), 4 vom: 24. Apr., Seite e14837 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Miao, Jing-Jing [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Caesarean section |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.04.2024 Date Revised 25.04.2024 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/iwj.14837 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM371187141 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM371187141 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240425235048.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240417s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/iwj.14837 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1386.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM371187141 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38629613 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miao, Jing-Jing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 18.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
| 520 | |a The accurate assessment of wound healing post-caesarean section, especially in twin pregnancies, remains a pivotal concern in obstetrics, given its implications for maternal health and recovery. Traditional methods, including conventional abdominal ultrasonography (CU), have been challenged by the advent of transvaginal ultrasonography (TU), offering potentially enhanced sensitivity and specificity. This meta-analysis directly compares the efficacy of TU and CU in evaluating wound healing and scar formation, crucial for optimizing postoperative care. Results indicate that TU is associated with significantly better outcomes in wound healing, demonstrated by lower REEDA scores (SMD = -20.56, 95% CI: [-27.34.20, -13.77], p < 0.01), and in scar formation reduction, evidenced by lower Manchester Scar Scale scores (SMD = -25.18, 95% CI: [-29.98, -20.39], p < 0.01). These findings underscore the potential of integrating TU into routine post-caesarean evaluation protocols to enhance care quality and patient recovery | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a caesarean section | |
| 650 | 4 | |a conventional abdominal ultrasonography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a transvaginal ultrasonography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a twin pregnancies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a wound healing | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Luo, Ying-Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chen-Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Hui-Xia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yu, Hong-Xia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International wound journal |d 2004 |g 21(2024), 4 vom: 24. Apr., Seite e14837 |w (DE-627)NLM162044909 |x 1742-481X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:24 |g month:04 |g pages:e14837 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14837 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 24 |c 04 |h e14837 | ||