Oncology care providers' perceptions and anticipated barriers regarding the use of geriatric assessment in routine clinic practice : A mixed-methods study
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: Geriatric assessment (GA) is currently not a standard of cancer care across Canada. In the Canadian province of Saskatchewan, there are no known formal geriatric teams in outpatient oncology settings. Therefore, it is not known whether, how, and to what extent GA is performed in oncology clinics, or what supports are needed to carry out a GA. The objective of this study was to explore Saskatchewan oncology care providers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices regarding GA, and their perceived barriers to implementing formal GA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, oncology physicians and nurses within the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency (SCA) were invited to participate in an anonymous survey and individual open-ended interview. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; free-text responses provided in the survey were summarized. Data from interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 19 physicians and 30 clinic nurses participated in the survey (response rate: 24% [physicians] and 38.0% [nurses]). In terms of cancer treatment and management, the majority (74% of physicians and 62% of nurses) stated considerations for older adults are different than younger patients. More than half (53% of physicians and 58% of nurses) reported making treatment and management decisions primarily based on judgement versus validated tools. For physicians whose practices involve prescribing chemotherapy (16/19), 75% rarely or never use validated tools (e.g., CARG, CRASH) to assess risk of chemotoxicity for older patients. Lack of time and supporting staff and feeling unsure as to where to refer older patients for help or follow-up were the most commonly voiced anticipated barriers to implementing GA. Two physicians and six nurses (n = 8) participated in the open-ended interviews. Main themes included: (1) tension between knowing the importance of GA versus capacity and (2) buy-in.
DISCUSSION: Our findings review barriers and opportunities for implementing GA in oncology care in Saskatchewan and provides foundational knowledge to inform efforts to promote personalized medicine and to optimize cancer care for older adults with cancer in this region.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:15 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of geriatric oncology - 15(2024), 4 vom: 15. Apr., Seite 101768 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sattar, Schroder [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 16.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101768 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM371156270 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM371156270 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240417233231.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240417s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101768 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1378.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM371156270 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38626515 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1879-4068(24)00066-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sattar, Schroder |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Oncology care providers' perceptions and anticipated barriers regarding the use of geriatric assessment in routine clinic practice |b A mixed-methods study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Geriatric assessment (GA) is currently not a standard of cancer care across Canada. In the Canadian province of Saskatchewan, there are no known formal geriatric teams in outpatient oncology settings. Therefore, it is not known whether, how, and to what extent GA is performed in oncology clinics, or what supports are needed to carry out a GA. The objective of this study was to explore Saskatchewan oncology care providers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices regarding GA, and their perceived barriers to implementing formal GA | ||
| 520 | |a MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, oncology physicians and nurses within the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency (SCA) were invited to participate in an anonymous survey and individual open-ended interview. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; free-text responses provided in the survey were summarized. Data from interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 19 physicians and 30 clinic nurses participated in the survey (response rate: 24% [physicians] and 38.0% [nurses]). In terms of cancer treatment and management, the majority (74% of physicians and 62% of nurses) stated considerations for older adults are different than younger patients. More than half (53% of physicians and 58% of nurses) reported making treatment and management decisions primarily based on judgement versus validated tools. For physicians whose practices involve prescribing chemotherapy (16/19), 75% rarely or never use validated tools (e.g., CARG, CRASH) to assess risk of chemotoxicity for older patients. Lack of time and supporting staff and feeling unsure as to where to refer older patients for help or follow-up were the most commonly voiced anticipated barriers to implementing GA. Two physicians and six nurses (n = 8) participated in the open-ended interviews. Main themes included: (1) tension between knowing the importance of GA versus capacity and (2) buy-in | ||
| 520 | |a DISCUSSION: Our findings review barriers and opportunities for implementing GA in oncology care in Saskatchewan and provides foundational knowledge to inform efforts to promote personalized medicine and to optimize cancer care for older adults with cancer in this region | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geriatric assessment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Haase, Kristen R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Puts, Martine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Iddrisu, Mohammed |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chalchal, Haji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Souied, Osama |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alibhai, Shabbir M H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ahmed, Shahid |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of geriatric oncology |d 2010 |g 15(2024), 4 vom: 15. Apr., Seite 101768 |w (DE-627)NLM203939069 |x 1879-4076 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g day:15 |g month:04 |g pages:101768 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101768 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 15 |j 2024 |e 4 |b 15 |c 04 |h 101768 | ||