Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary perfusion distribution and intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation in pigs A randomized crossover study
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved..
BACKGROUND: During one-lung ventilation (OLV), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can improve lung aeration, but might over-distend lung units and increase intrapulmonary shunt. We hypothesized that higher PEEP shifts pulmonary perfusion from the ventilated to the non-ventilated lung, resulting in a U-shaped relationship with intrapulmonary shunt during OLV.
METHODS: In nine anesthetized female pigs, a thoracotomy was performed and intravenous lipopolysaccharide infused to mimic the inflammatory response of thoracic surgery. Animals underwent OLV in supine position with PEEP of 0 cmH2O, 5 cmH2O, titrated to best respiratory system compliance, and 15 cmH2O (PEEP0, PEEP5, PEEPtitr, and PEEP15, respectively, 45 min each, Latin square sequence). Respiratory, hemodynamic, and gas exchange variables were measured. The distributions of perfusion and ventilation were determined by i.v. fluorescent microspheres and computed tomography, respectively.
RESULTS: Compared to two lung ventilation, the driving pressure increased with OLV, irrespective of the PEEP level. During OLV, cardiac output was lower at PEEP15 (5.5 ± 1.5 l/min) than PEEP0 (7.6 ± 3 l/min) and PEEP5 (7.4 ± 2.9 l/min; P=0.004), while the intrapulmonary shunt was highest at PEEP0 (PEEP0: 48.1 ± 14.4 %; PEEP5: 42.4 ± 14.8 %; PEEPtitr: 37.8 ± 11.0 %; PEEP15: 39.0 ± 10.7 %; P=0.027). The relative perfusion of the ventilated lung did not differ among PEEP levels (PEEP0: 65.0 ± 10.6 %; PEEP5:68.7 ± 8.7 %; PEEPtitr: 68.2 ± 10.5 %; PEEP15: 58.4 ± 12.8%; P=0.096), but the centers of relative perfusion and ventilation in the ventilated lung shifted from ventral to dorsal, and from cranial to caudal zones with increasing PEEP.
CONCLUSION: In this experimental model of thoracic surgery, higher PEEP during OLV did not shift the perfusion from the ventilated to the non-ventilated lung, thus not increasing intrapulmonary shunt.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered and approved by the Landesdirektion Dresden, Germany (25-5131/496/33).
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Anesthesiology - (2024) vom: 16. Apr. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Wittenstein, Jakob [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 16.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/ALN.0000000000005014 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM371147859 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM371147859 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240416233918.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240416s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005014 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1377.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM371147859 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38625679 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wittenstein, Jakob |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary perfusion distribution and intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation in pigs A randomized crossover study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: During one-lung ventilation (OLV), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can improve lung aeration, but might over-distend lung units and increase intrapulmonary shunt. We hypothesized that higher PEEP shifts pulmonary perfusion from the ventilated to the non-ventilated lung, resulting in a U-shaped relationship with intrapulmonary shunt during OLV | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: In nine anesthetized female pigs, a thoracotomy was performed and intravenous lipopolysaccharide infused to mimic the inflammatory response of thoracic surgery. Animals underwent OLV in supine position with PEEP of 0 cmH2O, 5 cmH2O, titrated to best respiratory system compliance, and 15 cmH2O (PEEP0, PEEP5, PEEPtitr, and PEEP15, respectively, 45 min each, Latin square sequence). Respiratory, hemodynamic, and gas exchange variables were measured. The distributions of perfusion and ventilation were determined by i.v. fluorescent microspheres and computed tomography, respectively | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Compared to two lung ventilation, the driving pressure increased with OLV, irrespective of the PEEP level. During OLV, cardiac output was lower at PEEP15 (5.5 ± 1.5 l/min) than PEEP0 (7.6 ± 3 l/min) and PEEP5 (7.4 ± 2.9 l/min; P=0.004), while the intrapulmonary shunt was highest at PEEP0 (PEEP0: 48.1 ± 14.4 %; PEEP5: 42.4 ± 14.8 %; PEEPtitr: 37.8 ± 11.0 %; PEEP15: 39.0 ± 10.7 %; P=0.027). The relative perfusion of the ventilated lung did not differ among PEEP levels (PEEP0: 65.0 ± 10.6 %; PEEP5:68.7 ± 8.7 %; PEEPtitr: 68.2 ± 10.5 %; PEEP15: 58.4 ± 12.8%; P=0.096), but the centers of relative perfusion and ventilation in the ventilated lung shifted from ventral to dorsal, and from cranial to caudal zones with increasing PEEP | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: In this experimental model of thoracic surgery, higher PEEP during OLV did not shift the perfusion from the ventilated to the non-ventilated lung, thus not increasing intrapulmonary shunt | ||
| 520 | |a TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered and approved by the Landesdirektion Dresden, Germany (25-5131/496/33) | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scharffenberg, Martin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fröhlich, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rothmann, Carolin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ran, Xi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yingying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chai, Yusen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Xiuli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Müller, Sabine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Koch, Thea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huhle, Robert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gama de Abreu, Marcelo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Anesthesiology |d 1945 |g (2024) vom: 16. Apr. |w (DE-627)NLM00001267X |x 1528-1175 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:16 |g month:04 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005014 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 16 |c 04 | ||