The effect of nicotine-containing products on peri-implant tissues : A systematic review and network meta-analysis
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco..
INTRODUCTION: Smokers have a higher chance of developing peri-implant diseases and are therefore considered an at-risk population. Our aim was to compare peri-implant characteristics in users of electronic cigarettes (EC), waterpipes (WP), cigarettes (CS), smokeless tobacco (ST), and non-smokers (non-users of any nicotine and tobacco product; NS).
METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was performed until April 2023, restricted to English language. Thirty-nine observational studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 32 studies were included in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Using a predesigned form, two researchers independently collected data about marginal bone loss (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), modified plaque index (mPI), probing pocket depth > 4mm (PPD>4), gingival index (GI), peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) volume, and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. QUIPS and CINeMA were used to evaluate the risk of bias and certainty of evidence.
RESULTS: NS had the smallest MBL. Most nicotine-containing product users had significantly higher MBL (CS, MD:1.34 CrI: 0.85, 1.79; WP, MD:1.58 CrI: 0.84, 2.35; ST, MD:2.53, CrI: 1.20, 3.87) than NS. EC did not show significant difference compared to NS (MD:0.52 CrI: -0.33, 1.36). In secondary outcomes NS were ranked in first place. Subset analysis based on smoking habit, implant duration, and maintenance control revealed no differences in ranking probability.
CONCLUSION: Most nicotine-containing product users presented worse peri-implant parameters compared to non-smokers, while EC users did not show significant differences to NS in many outcomes.
IMPLICATION: Alternative nicotine-containing products are gaining popularity and are often considered less harmful by the general public compared to traditional cigarettes. This is the first network meta-analysis comparing users of four nicotine-containing products and non-smokers. This study shows that CS, WP and ST have a detrimental effect on the overall health of peri-implant tissues. EC users also presented inferior parameters compared to NS, however, the difference was not significant in many outcomes. It is essential to educate patients who are using nicotine-containing products, and to provide proper maintenance and appropriate cessation support. Well-designed multi-armed studies are needed for direct comparison of different products, including heated tobacco products. Greater transparency of confounding factors is needed regarding smoking habit and oral hygiene.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco - (2024) vom: 15. Apr. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Vámos, Orsolya [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Cigarette smoking |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 15.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
---|
doi: |
10.1093/ntr/ntae085 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM371080126 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM371080126 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240415234735.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240415s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/ntr/ntae085 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1376.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM371080126 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38618685 | ||
035 | |a (PII)ntae085 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vámos, Orsolya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The effect of nicotine-containing products on peri-implant tissues |b A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 15.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
520 | |a © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. | ||
520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Smokers have a higher chance of developing peri-implant diseases and are therefore considered an at-risk population. Our aim was to compare peri-implant characteristics in users of electronic cigarettes (EC), waterpipes (WP), cigarettes (CS), smokeless tobacco (ST), and non-smokers (non-users of any nicotine and tobacco product; NS) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) was performed until April 2023, restricted to English language. Thirty-nine observational studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 32 studies were included in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Using a predesigned form, two researchers independently collected data about marginal bone loss (MBL), probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), modified plaque index (mPI), probing pocket depth > 4mm (PPD>4), gingival index (GI), peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) volume, and TNF-α and IL-1β levels. QUIPS and CINeMA were used to evaluate the risk of bias and certainty of evidence | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: NS had the smallest MBL. Most nicotine-containing product users had significantly higher MBL (CS, MD:1.34 CrI: 0.85, 1.79; WP, MD:1.58 CrI: 0.84, 2.35; ST, MD:2.53, CrI: 1.20, 3.87) than NS. EC did not show significant difference compared to NS (MD:0.52 CrI: -0.33, 1.36). In secondary outcomes NS were ranked in first place. Subset analysis based on smoking habit, implant duration, and maintenance control revealed no differences in ranking probability | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Most nicotine-containing product users presented worse peri-implant parameters compared to non-smokers, while EC users did not show significant differences to NS in many outcomes | ||
520 | |a IMPLICATION: Alternative nicotine-containing products are gaining popularity and are often considered less harmful by the general public compared to traditional cigarettes. This is the first network meta-analysis comparing users of four nicotine-containing products and non-smokers. This study shows that CS, WP and ST have a detrimental effect on the overall health of peri-implant tissues. EC users also presented inferior parameters compared to NS, however, the difference was not significant in many outcomes. It is essential to educate patients who are using nicotine-containing products, and to provide proper maintenance and appropriate cessation support. Well-designed multi-armed studies are needed for direct comparison of different products, including heated tobacco products. Greater transparency of confounding factors is needed regarding smoking habit and oral hygiene | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a cigarette smoking | |
650 | 4 | |a e-cigarette | |
650 | 4 | |a peri-implant parameters | |
650 | 4 | |a peri-implantitis | |
650 | 4 | |a smokeless tobacco | |
650 | 4 | |a tobacco | |
650 | 4 | |a waterpipe | |
700 | 1 | |a Komora, Péter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gede, Noémi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hegyi, Péter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kelemen, Kata |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Varga, Gábor |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mikulás, Krisztina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kerémi, Beáta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kispélyi, Barbara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco |d 1997 |g (2024) vom: 15. Apr. |w (DE-627)NLM097536172 |x 1469-994X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:15 |g month:04 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae085 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2024 |b 15 |c 04 |