Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis : A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early Postoperative Recovery
© 2024 Laoruengthana et al..
Background: Cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may provide better physiological knee kinematics, proprioception, and quadricep recovery than posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Therefore, we hypothesized that CR TKA with multimodal pain control may provide comparable postoperative pain and recovery as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).
Methods: This study included patients with isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent CR TKA and UKA. TKA and UKA patients were propensity score-matched with age and body mass index (BMI) and compared using visual analog scales (VAS) for pain scores, total amount of morphine use (TMU), knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR), independent ambulation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs during hospitalization.
Results: After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in the TKA and UKA groups, respectively, with no differences in demographic data. VAS at 6-72 h and TMU at 48 h after surgery were comparable between the groups. The knee flexion angle in the UKA group was significantly higher at 24 h (60.0° vs 46.6°; p<0.001) and 48 h (76.9° vs 69.1°; p = 0.021) than that in the TKA group. The SLR in the UKA group was significantly higher than that in the TKA group at 24-72 h. The UKA group ambulated significantly earlier (1.56 vs 2.13 days; p<0.001), had shorter LOS (3.68 vs 4.28 days; p<0.004) and incurred 12.43% lower costs when compared to the TKA group.
Conclusion: Patients who underwent CR TKA with multimodal pain management did not experience more postoperative pain or morphine use than those who underwent UKA. However, UKA patients seem to experienced faster recovery and shorter LOS than CR-TKA patients during the early postoperative course. Accordingly, UKA may be considered instead of TKA for patients who are good candidates for UKA and require expedited recovery.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Orthopedic research and reviews - 16(2024) vom: 01., Seite 103-110 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Laoruengthana, Artit [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Cruciate-retaining |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 25.04.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.2147/ORR.S444547 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM371061245 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM371061245 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240425234508.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240415s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2147/ORR.S444547 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1386.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM371061245 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38616802 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Laoruengthana, Artit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis |b A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early Postoperative Recovery |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024 Laoruengthana et al. | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may provide better physiological knee kinematics, proprioception, and quadricep recovery than posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. Therefore, we hypothesized that CR TKA with multimodal pain control may provide comparable postoperative pain and recovery as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) | ||
| 520 | |a Methods: This study included patients with isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent CR TKA and UKA. TKA and UKA patients were propensity score-matched with age and body mass index (BMI) and compared using visual analog scales (VAS) for pain scores, total amount of morphine use (TMU), knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR), independent ambulation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs during hospitalization | ||
| 520 | |a Results: After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in the TKA and UKA groups, respectively, with no differences in demographic data. VAS at 6-72 h and TMU at 48 h after surgery were comparable between the groups. The knee flexion angle in the UKA group was significantly higher at 24 h (60.0° vs 46.6°; p<0.001) and 48 h (76.9° vs 69.1°; p = 0.021) than that in the TKA group. The SLR in the UKA group was significantly higher than that in the TKA group at 24-72 h. The UKA group ambulated significantly earlier (1.56 vs 2.13 days; p<0.001), had shorter LOS (3.68 vs 4.28 days; p<0.004) and incurred 12.43% lower costs when compared to the TKA group | ||
| 520 | |a Conclusion: Patients who underwent CR TKA with multimodal pain management did not experience more postoperative pain or morphine use than those who underwent UKA. However, UKA patients seem to experienced faster recovery and shorter LOS than CR-TKA patients during the early postoperative course. Accordingly, UKA may be considered instead of TKA for patients who are good candidates for UKA and require expedited recovery | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cruciate-retaining | |
| 650 | 4 | |a postoperative pain | |
| 650 | 4 | |a recovery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a total knee arthroplasty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Reosanguanwong, Kongpob |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rattanaprichavej, Piti |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sahasoonthorn, Kamonnop |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Santisathaporn, Nopparat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pongpirul, Krit |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Orthopedic research and reviews |d 2009 |g 16(2024) vom: 01., Seite 103-110 |w (DE-627)NLM199620075 |x 1179-1462 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2024 |g day:01 |g pages:103-110 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S444547 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2024 |b 01 |h 103-110 | ||