Boosting Vaccine Response in Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Patients With Inadequate Seroconversion : An Analysis of the Immunogenicity of Vector-Based and Inactivated Vaccines
Copyright © 2024, Vijayan et al..
BACKGROUND: An additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine is being offered to vaccinated people, especially those immunocompromised. The most widely available vaccines in India are the adenoviral vector-based AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) and the heat-inactivated (BBV152). This study investigated the efficacy of both vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD).
OBJECTIVES: To compare final anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, neutralization of pseudovirions by these antibodies, and T cell responses between patients of AIRD who had received the third dose of AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccines.
METHODS: Patients with stable AIRD who had completed two doses of COVID-19 vaccination but had a suboptimal response (anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody<212) were randomized (1:1) to receive either AZD1222 or BBV152 as a booster dose. Patients with previous hybrid immunity or those who developed COVID-19 during the trial were excluded. Antibody titers, neutralization of Wuhan and Omicron pseudovirions, and interferon release by T cells (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot)) in response to the Spike antigen were measured four weeks after this booster dose.
RESULTS: 146 were screened, 91 were randomized, and 67 were analyzed per protocol. The third dose improved antibody titers (p<0.001), neutralization of the Wuhan strain (p<0.001), and T cell interferon release (p<0.001) but not neutralization of the Omicron strain (p=0.24). Antibody titers were higher (p<0.005) after ADZ1222 boost (2,414 IU (interquartile range (IQR): 330-10,315)) than BBV1222 (347.7 IU (0.4-973)). Neutralization of the Wuhan stain was better (AZD1222: 76.6%(23.0-95.45) versus BBV152 (32.7% (0-78.9), p=0.03 by ANCOVA). Neutralization of Omicron (0 (0-28.4) vs 0 (0-4.8)) and T cell interferon release (57.0 IU (23.5-95) vs 50.5 IU (13.2-139)) were similar.
CONCLUSION: The third dose improved all parameters of immunogenicity in AIRD patients with previous inadequate responses except Omicron neutralization. The vector-based vaccine exhibits notable efficacy, particularly in antibody titers and neutralizing the Wuhan strain.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/12/038928.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Cureus - 16(2024), 3 vom: 28. März, Seite e55764 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Vijayan, Anuroopa [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Booster vaccine |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 09.04.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.7759/cureus.55764 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370761863 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM370761863 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240409233036.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240408s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.7759/cureus.55764 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1370.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370761863 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38586774 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vijayan, Anuroopa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Boosting Vaccine Response in Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease Patients With Inadequate Seroconversion |b An Analysis of the Immunogenicity of Vector-Based and Inactivated Vaccines |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 09.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2024, Vijayan et al. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: An additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine is being offered to vaccinated people, especially those immunocompromised. The most widely available vaccines in India are the adenoviral vector-based AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) and the heat-inactivated (BBV152). This study investigated the efficacy of both vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To compare final anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, neutralization of pseudovirions by these antibodies, and T cell responses between patients of AIRD who had received the third dose of AZD1222 and BBV152 vaccines | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Patients with stable AIRD who had completed two doses of COVID-19 vaccination but had a suboptimal response (anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody<212) were randomized (1:1) to receive either AZD1222 or BBV152 as a booster dose. Patients with previous hybrid immunity or those who developed COVID-19 during the trial were excluded. Antibody titers, neutralization of Wuhan and Omicron pseudovirions, and interferon release by T cells (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot)) in response to the Spike antigen were measured four weeks after this booster dose | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: 146 were screened, 91 were randomized, and 67 were analyzed per protocol. The third dose improved antibody titers (p<0.001), neutralization of the Wuhan strain (p<0.001), and T cell interferon release (p<0.001) but not neutralization of the Omicron strain (p=0.24). Antibody titers were higher (p<0.005) after ADZ1222 boost (2,414 IU (interquartile range (IQR): 330-10,315)) than BBV1222 (347.7 IU (0.4-973)). Neutralization of the Wuhan stain was better (AZD1222: 76.6%(23.0-95.45) versus BBV152 (32.7% (0-78.9), p=0.03 by ANCOVA). Neutralization of Omicron (0 (0-28.4) vs 0 (0-4.8)) and T cell interferon release (57.0 IU (23.5-95) vs 50.5 IU (13.2-139)) were similar | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The third dose improved all parameters of immunogenicity in AIRD patients with previous inadequate responses except Omicron neutralization. The vector-based vaccine exhibits notable efficacy, particularly in antibody titers and neutralizing the Wuhan strain | ||
520 | |a TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/12/038928 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a booster vaccine | |
650 | 4 | |a covid 19 vaccine | |
650 | 4 | |a heterologous vaccine | |
650 | 4 | |a immunocompromised patient | |
650 | 4 | |a immunogenicity | |
700 | 1 | |a Sukumaran, Aswathy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jones, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Paul, Aby |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ahmed, Sakir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mehta, Pankti |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mohanan, Manju |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kumar, Santhosh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Easwaran, Sreekumar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shenoy, Padmanabha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cureus |d 2013 |g 16(2024), 3 vom: 28. März, Seite e55764 |w (DE-627)NLM24118083X |x 2168-8184 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:28 |g month:03 |g pages:e55764 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.55764 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 28 |c 03 |h e55764 |