Developing a questionnaire to evaluate an automated audit & feedback intervention : a Rand-modified Delphi method
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy to evaluate and improve medical practice. The optimal design of an A&F system is uncertain and structured process evaluations are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the use of automated A&F systems.
METHODS: Based on the Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) and the REFLECT-52 (REassessing audit & Feedback interventions: a tooL for Evaluating Compliance with suggested besT practices) evaluation tool a questionnaire was designed for the purpose of evaluating automated A&F systems. A Rand-modified Delphi method was used to develop the process evaluation and obtain validation. Fourteen experts from different domains in primary care consented to participate and individually scored the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Afterwards, the questions were discussed in a consensus meeting. After approval, the final questionnaire was compiled.
RESULTS: A 34-question questionnaire composed of 57 items was developed and presented to the expert panel. The consensus meeting resulted in a selection of 31 questions, subdivided into 43 items. A final list of 30 questions consisting of 42 items was obtained.
CONCLUSION: A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was drawn up for the assessment and improvement of automated A&F systems, based on CP-FIT and REFLECT-52 theory and approved by experts. Next steps will be piloting and implementation of the questionnaire.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC health services research - 24(2024), 1 vom: 05. Apr., Seite 433 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Van den Wyngaert, Ine [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Audit and feedback |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.04.2024 Date Revised 08.04.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370704177 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370704177 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240408233212.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240406s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1369.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370704177 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38581009 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Van den Wyngaert, Ine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Developing a questionnaire to evaluate an automated audit & feedback intervention |b a Rand-modified Delphi method |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 08.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 08.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback (A&F) is a widely used implementation strategy to evaluate and improve medical practice. The optimal design of an A&F system is uncertain and structured process evaluations are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire to evaluate the use of automated A&F systems | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Based on the Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) and the REFLECT-52 (REassessing audit & Feedback interventions: a tooL for Evaluating Compliance with suggested besT practices) evaluation tool a questionnaire was designed for the purpose of evaluating automated A&F systems. A Rand-modified Delphi method was used to develop the process evaluation and obtain validation. Fourteen experts from different domains in primary care consented to participate and individually scored the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Afterwards, the questions were discussed in a consensus meeting. After approval, the final questionnaire was compiled | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A 34-question questionnaire composed of 57 items was developed and presented to the expert panel. The consensus meeting resulted in a selection of 31 questions, subdivided into 43 items. A final list of 30 questions consisting of 42 items was obtained | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: A questionnaire consisting of 30 questions was drawn up for the assessment and improvement of automated A&F systems, based on CP-FIT and REFLECT-52 theory and approved by experts. Next steps will be piloting and implementation of the questionnaire | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Audit and feedback | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Delphi method | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical audit | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Process evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality of health care | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Questionnaire | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Pottelbergh, Gijs |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Coteur, Kristien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vaes, Bert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van den Bulck, Steve |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC health services research |d 2001 |g 24(2024), 1 vom: 05. Apr., Seite 433 |w (DE-627)NLM111682703 |x 1472-6963 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:05 |g month:04 |g pages:433 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10915-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 05 |c 04 |h 433 | ||