Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients : a multicenter study
© 2024. The Author(s)..
Hereby, we aimed to comprehensively compare different scoring systems for pediatric trauma and their ability to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The current registry-based multicenter study encompassed a comprehensive dataset of 6709 pediatric trauma patients aged ≤ 18 years from July 2016 to September 2023. To ascertain the predictive efficacy of the scoring systems, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. A total of 720 individuals (10.7%) required admission to the ICU. The mortality rate was 1.1% (n = 72). The most predictive scoring system for in-hospital mortality was the adjusted trauma and injury severity score (aTRISS) (AUC = 0.982), followed by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) (AUC = 0.980), new trauma and injury severity score (NTRISS) (AUC = 0.972), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (AUC = 0.9546), revised trauma score (RTS) (AUC = 0.944), pre-hospital index (PHI) (AUC = 0.936), injury severity score (ISS) (AUC = 0.901), new injury severity score (NISS) (AUC = 0.900), and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) (AUC = 0.734). Given the predictive performance of the scoring systems for ICU admission, NTRISS had the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.837), followed by aTRISS (AUC = 0.836), TRISS (AUC = 0.823), ISS (AUC = 0.807), NISS (AUC = 0.805), GCS (AUC = 0.735), RTS (AUC = 0.698), PHI (AUC = 0.662), and AIS (AUC = 0.651). In the present study, we concluded the superiority of the TRISS and its two derived counterparts, aTRISS and NTRISS, compared to other scoring systems, to efficiently discerning individuals who possess a heightened susceptibility to unfavorable consequences. The significance of these findings underscores the necessity of incorporating these metrics into the realm of clinical practice.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Scientific reports - 14(2024), 1 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 7646 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Khavandegar, Armin [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Children |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.04.2024 Date Revised 15.04.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370508815 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370508815 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240416232917.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240403s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1377.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370508815 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38561381 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Khavandegar, Armin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients |b a multicenter study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 03.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a Hereby, we aimed to comprehensively compare different scoring systems for pediatric trauma and their ability to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The current registry-based multicenter study encompassed a comprehensive dataset of 6709 pediatric trauma patients aged ≤ 18 years from July 2016 to September 2023. To ascertain the predictive efficacy of the scoring systems, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. A total of 720 individuals (10.7%) required admission to the ICU. The mortality rate was 1.1% (n = 72). The most predictive scoring system for in-hospital mortality was the adjusted trauma and injury severity score (aTRISS) (AUC = 0.982), followed by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) (AUC = 0.980), new trauma and injury severity score (NTRISS) (AUC = 0.972), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) (AUC = 0.9546), revised trauma score (RTS) (AUC = 0.944), pre-hospital index (PHI) (AUC = 0.936), injury severity score (ISS) (AUC = 0.901), new injury severity score (NISS) (AUC = 0.900), and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) (AUC = 0.734). Given the predictive performance of the scoring systems for ICU admission, NTRISS had the highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.837), followed by aTRISS (AUC = 0.836), TRISS (AUC = 0.823), ISS (AUC = 0.807), NISS (AUC = 0.805), GCS (AUC = 0.735), RTS (AUC = 0.698), PHI (AUC = 0.662), and AIS (AUC = 0.651). In the present study, we concluded the superiority of the TRISS and its two derived counterparts, aTRISS and NTRISS, compared to other scoring systems, to efficiently discerning individuals who possess a heightened susceptibility to unfavorable consequences. The significance of these findings underscores the necessity of incorporating these metrics into the realm of clinical practice | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Children | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Injury severity score | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pediatric trauma score | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Survival prediction model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trauma and injury severity score | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trauma scoring system | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salamati, Payman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zafarghandi, Mohammadreza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fakharian, Esmaeil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Saeed-Banadaky, Seyed Houssein |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hoseinpour, Vahid |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sadeghian, Farideh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nasr Isfahani, Mehdi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rahmanian, Vahid |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ghadiphasha, Amir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pourmasjedi, Sobhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Piri, Seyed Mohammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mirzamohamadi, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hassan Zadeh Tabatabaei, Mahgol Sadat |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Naghdi, Khatereh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Baigi, Vali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scientific reports |d 2011 |g 14(2024), 1 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 7646 |w (DE-627)NLM215703936 |x 2045-2322 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:7646 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 01 |c 04 |h 7646 | ||