10 kHz stimulation as rescue therapy for spinal cord stimulation trial failure or loss of efficacy : A retrospective study
© 2024 World Institute of Pain..
INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is currently used for the management of pain of different origin, and since its inception, many waveforms have been developed. Some patients experience no pain relief already during SCS trial, while other patients go through a loss of efficacy due to habituation after a variable period of satisfying pain control. Our retrospective study represents the first report exploring the potential role of 10 kHz stimulation as rescue therapy for patients who did not benefit not only from conventional stimulation but even from other waveforms during SCS trial or follow-up.
METHODS: This study was conducted in Germany; we retrospectively enrolled patients with no pain relief during SCS trial or with loss of efficacy of other waveforms over time; and we recorded visual analogic scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and daily opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), right before and 12 months after the switching to 10 kHz simulation.
RESULTS: The rate of successful switching to 10 kHz stimulation was comparable in patients enrolled during the SCS trial and during the follow-up (43% vs. 40%, respectively); notably, the highest rate of failed rescue was recorded in case of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) II. Patients who responded to the switching showed a significant improvement in VAS and ODI after 12 months of treatment compared to baseline (3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 8.2 ± 0.9, p < 0.00001 and 34.0 ± 7.8 vs. 64.3 ± 8.7, p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas there was no reduction in the consumption of opioids in terms of MME (3 (0-16) vs. 5 (0-8.75), p = 0.1003).
CONCLUSIONS: Rescue therapy with 10 kHz stimulation could be an important strategy to avoid SCS explant in both patients non-responsive during trial or experiencing a loss of efficacy during the years with other waveforms.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain - (2024) vom: 01. Apr. |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Buonanno, Pasquale [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Complex regional pain syndromes |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 01.04.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/papr.13369 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM37048035X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM37048035X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240403001023.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240403s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/papr.13369 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1361.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM37048035X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)38558532 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Buonanno, Pasquale |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a 10 kHz stimulation as rescue therapy for spinal cord stimulation trial failure or loss of efficacy |b A retrospective study |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 01.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
520 | |a © 2024 World Institute of Pain. | ||
520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is currently used for the management of pain of different origin, and since its inception, many waveforms have been developed. Some patients experience no pain relief already during SCS trial, while other patients go through a loss of efficacy due to habituation after a variable period of satisfying pain control. Our retrospective study represents the first report exploring the potential role of 10 kHz stimulation as rescue therapy for patients who did not benefit not only from conventional stimulation but even from other waveforms during SCS trial or follow-up | ||
520 | |a METHODS: This study was conducted in Germany; we retrospectively enrolled patients with no pain relief during SCS trial or with loss of efficacy of other waveforms over time; and we recorded visual analogic scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and daily opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME), right before and 12 months after the switching to 10 kHz simulation | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The rate of successful switching to 10 kHz stimulation was comparable in patients enrolled during the SCS trial and during the follow-up (43% vs. 40%, respectively); notably, the highest rate of failed rescue was recorded in case of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) II. Patients who responded to the switching showed a significant improvement in VAS and ODI after 12 months of treatment compared to baseline (3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 8.2 ± 0.9, p < 0.00001 and 34.0 ± 7.8 vs. 64.3 ± 8.7, p < 0.0001, respectively), whereas there was no reduction in the consumption of opioids in terms of MME (3 (0-16) vs. 5 (0-8.75), p = 0.1003) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Rescue therapy with 10 kHz stimulation could be an important strategy to avoid SCS explant in both patients non-responsive during trial or experiencing a loss of efficacy during the years with other waveforms | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a complex regional pain syndromes | |
650 | 4 | |a low back pain | |
650 | 4 | |a pain | |
650 | 4 | |a spinal cord stimulation | |
700 | 1 | |a Servillo, Giuseppe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Matis, Georgios |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain |d 2001 |g (2024) vom: 01. Apr. |w (DE-627)NLM166816795 |x 1533-2500 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:01 |g month:04 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13369 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2024 |b 01 |c 04 |