From "wading through treacle" to "making haste slowly" : A comprehensive yet parsimonious model of drivers and challenges to implementing patient data sharing projects based on an EPaCCS evaluation and four pre-existing literature reviews

Copyright: © 2024 Petrova, Barclay. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited..

Conceptually, this study aimed to 1) identify the challenges and drivers encountered by England's Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System (EPaCCS) projects in the context of challenges and drivers in other projects on data sharing for individual care (also referred to as Health Information Exchange, HIE) and 2) organise them in a comprehensive yet parsimonious framework. The study also had a strong applied goal: to derive specific and non-trivial recommendations for advancing data sharing projects, particularly ones in early stages of development and implementation. Primary data comprised 40 in-depth interviews with 44 healthcare professionals, patients, carers, project team members and decision makers in Cambridgeshire, UK. Secondary data were extracted from four pre-existing literature reviews on Health Information Exchange and Health Information Technology implementation covering 135 studies. Thematic and framework analysis underpinned by "pluralist" coding were the main analytical approaches used. We reduced an initial set of >1,800 parameters into >500 challenges and >300 drivers to implementing EPaCCS and other data sharing projects. Less than a quarter of the 800+ parameters were associated primarily with the IT solution. These challenges and drivers were further condensed into an action-guiding, strategy-informing framework of nine types of "pure challenges", four types of "pure drivers", and nine types of "oppositional or ambivalent forces". The pure challenges draw parallels between patient data sharing and other broad and complex domains of sociotechnical or social practice. The pure drivers differ in how internal or external to the IT solution and project team they are, and thus in the level of control a project team has over them. The oppositional forces comprise pairs of challenges and drivers where the driver is a factor serving to resolve or counteract the challenge. The ambivalent forces are factors perceived simultaneously as a challenge and a driver depending on context, goals and perspective. The framework is distinctive in its emphasis on: 1) the form of challenges and drivers; 2) ambivalence, ambiguity and persistent tensions as fundamental forces in the field of innovation implementation; and 3) the parallels it draws with a variety of non-IT, non-health domains of practice as a source of fruitful learning. Teams working on data sharing projects need to prioritise further the shaping of social interactions and structural and contextual parameters in the midst of which their IT tools are implemented. The high number of "ambivalent forces" speaks of the vital importance for data sharing projects of skills in eliciting stakeholders' assumptions; managing conflict; and navigating multiple needs, interests and worldviews.

Medienart:	E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:	2024
Erschienen:	2024

Enthalten in:	Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:3
Enthalten in:	PLOS digital health - 3(2024), 4 vom: 01. Apr., Seite e0000470

Sprache:	Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:	Petrova, Mila [VerfasserIn] Barclay, Stephen [VerfasserIn]

Links:	Volltext

Themen:	Journal Article

Anmerkungen:	Date Revised 03.04.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE

doi:	10.1371/journal.pdig.0000470

funding:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	NLM370472977