An inferior vena cava-priority approach in laparoscopic isolated hepatic caudate lobectomy
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature..
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy is still a challenging operation for surgeons. The access route of the operation plays a vital role during laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. There are few references regarding this technique. Here, we introduce a preferred inferior vena cava (IVC) approach in laparoscopic caudate lobectomy.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with caudate hepatic tumours between June 2016 and December 2021 were included in this study. All of them received laparoscopic caudate lobectomy involving an IVC priority approach. The IVC priority approach refers to prioritizing the dissection of the IVC from the liver parenchyma before proceeding with the conventional left or right approach. It emphasizes the importance of the IVC dissection during process. Clinical data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative results were evaluated. Sixteen patients were performed pure IVC priority approach, while 5 patients underwent a combined approach. We subsequently compared the intraoperative and postoperative between the two groups.
RESULTS: All 21 patients were treated with laparoscopic technology. The operative time was 190.95 ± 92.65 min. The average estimated blood loss was 251.43 ± 247.45 ml, and four patients needed blood transfusions during the perioperative period. The average duration of hospital stay was 8.43 ± 2.64 (range from 6.0 to 16.0) days. Patients who underwent the pure inferior vena cava (IVC) approach required a shorter hepatic pedicle clamping time (26 vs. 55 min, respectively; P < 0.001) and operation time (150 vs. 380 min, respectively; P = 0.002) than those who underwent the combined approach. Hospitalization (7.0 vs. 9.0 days, respectively; P = 0.006) was shorter in the pure IVC group than in the combined group.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic caudate lobectomy with an IVC priority approach is safe and feasible for patients with caudate hepatic tumours.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:409 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Langenbeck's archives of surgery - 409(2024), 1 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 106 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Guo, Lei [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Caudate hepatic tumours |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.04.2024 Date Revised 02.04.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s00423-024-03299-8 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370460502 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370460502 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240403000810.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240401s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00423-024-03299-8 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1361.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370460502 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38556526 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Guo, Lei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An inferior vena cava-priority approach in laparoscopic isolated hepatic caudate lobectomy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 02.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 02.04.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy is still a challenging operation for surgeons. The access route of the operation plays a vital role during laparoscopic caudate lobectomy. There are few references regarding this technique. Here, we introduce a preferred inferior vena cava (IVC) approach in laparoscopic caudate lobectomy | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with caudate hepatic tumours between June 2016 and December 2021 were included in this study. All of them received laparoscopic caudate lobectomy involving an IVC priority approach. The IVC priority approach refers to prioritizing the dissection of the IVC from the liver parenchyma before proceeding with the conventional left or right approach. It emphasizes the importance of the IVC dissection during process. Clinical data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative results were evaluated. Sixteen patients were performed pure IVC priority approach, while 5 patients underwent a combined approach. We subsequently compared the intraoperative and postoperative between the two groups | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: All 21 patients were treated with laparoscopic technology. The operative time was 190.95 ± 92.65 min. The average estimated blood loss was 251.43 ± 247.45 ml, and four patients needed blood transfusions during the perioperative period. The average duration of hospital stay was 8.43 ± 2.64 (range from 6.0 to 16.0) days. Patients who underwent the pure inferior vena cava (IVC) approach required a shorter hepatic pedicle clamping time (26 vs. 55 min, respectively; P < 0.001) and operation time (150 vs. 380 min, respectively; P = 0.002) than those who underwent the combined approach. Hospitalization (7.0 vs. 9.0 days, respectively; P = 0.006) was shorter in the pure IVC group than in the combined group | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic caudate lobectomy with an IVC priority approach is safe and feasible for patients with caudate hepatic tumours | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Caudate hepatic tumours | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inferior vena cava | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laparoscopic caudate lobectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retrospective | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surgical approach | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Xiao-Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xue, Jie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sun, Ju-Xian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yuan, Sheng-Xian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yi, Bin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Liang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shi, Jie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Shu-Qun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guo, Wei-Xing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Langenbeck's archives of surgery |d 1998 |g 409(2024), 1 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 106 |w (DE-627)NLM095673148 |x 1435-2451 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:409 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:106 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03299-8 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 409 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 01 |c 04 |h 106 | ||