Prostaglandins or cervical balloon for the induction of labor for cervical ripening : a literature review
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS..
OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor in France concerns one birth out of four with 70% of induction starting by cervical ripening, either with a pharmacological (prostaglandins) or a mechanical (balloon) method. This review aims to compare these two methods within current knowledge, using the PRISMA methodology.
METHODS: Trials comparing these two methods, published or unpublished up to July 2023, in French or English were searched for in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrial.govs datasets. Fifty articles including 10 689 women were selected. The outcomes of interest were those from the Core Outcome Set for trails on Induction of Labour (COSIOL) list: mode of delivery, time from induction-to-birth, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and maternal satisfaction.
RESULT: No differences were observed between the two methods for the mode of delivery or neonatal and maternal morbidity. The time from induction-to-birth was longer for mechanical methods. Those were also associated with a greater need for oxytocin, less uterine hyperstimulation and less instrumental deliveries. Maternal satisfaction was assessed in only nine trials using various scales which made the interpretation of maternal satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of these two induction methods is similar for vaginal delivery, but it remains to be seen which one best meets women's satisfaction criteria.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie - (2024) vom: 29. März |
| Sprache: |
Französisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
Méthodes pharmacologiques ou mécaniques pour la maturation cervicale: une revue de la littérature |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Lamirand, Helena [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Ballonet |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 31.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.011 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370456513 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370456513 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240401233236.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240401s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.011 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1359.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370456513 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38556131 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S2468-7189(24)00115-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a fre | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lamirand, Helena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prostaglandins or cervical balloon for the induction of labor for cervical ripening |b a literature review |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Méthodes pharmacologiques ou mécaniques pour la maturation cervicale: une revue de la littérature |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 31.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor in France concerns one birth out of four with 70% of induction starting by cervical ripening, either with a pharmacological (prostaglandins) or a mechanical (balloon) method. This review aims to compare these two methods within current knowledge, using the PRISMA methodology | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Trials comparing these two methods, published or unpublished up to July 2023, in French or English were searched for in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrial.govs datasets. Fifty articles including 10 689 women were selected. The outcomes of interest were those from the Core Outcome Set for trails on Induction of Labour (COSIOL) list: mode of delivery, time from induction-to-birth, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and maternal satisfaction | ||
| 520 | |a RESULT: No differences were observed between the two methods for the mode of delivery or neonatal and maternal morbidity. The time from induction-to-birth was longer for mechanical methods. Those were also associated with a greater need for oxytocin, less uterine hyperstimulation and less instrumental deliveries. Maternal satisfaction was assessed in only nine trials using various scales which made the interpretation of maternal satisfaction | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The efficacy of these two induction methods is similar for vaginal delivery, but it remains to be seen which one best meets women's satisfaction criteria | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a English Abstract | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Déclenchement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Induction of labor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ballonet | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cervical balloon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a labor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prostaglandines | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prostaglandins | |
| 650 | 4 | |a travail | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Diguisto, Caroline |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie |d 2017 |g (2024) vom: 29. März |w (DE-627)NLM269302743 |x 2468-7189 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:29 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.011 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 29 |c 03 | ||