Validation of machine learning models for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction on point-of-care ultrasound : insights on features that impact performance
© 2024. Crown..
BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) algorithms can accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiography, but their performance on cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is not well understood.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the performance of an ML model for estimation of LVEF on cardiac POCUS compared with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and formal echo reported LVEF.
METHODS: Clinicians at a tertiary care heart failure clinic prospectively scanned 138 participants using hand-carried devices. Video data were analyzed offline by an ML model for LVEF. We compared the ML model's performance with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and echo reported LVEF.
RESULTS: There were 138 participants scanned, yielding 1257 videos. The ML model generated LVEF predictions on 341 videos. We observed a good intraclass correlation (ICC) between the ML model's predictions and the reference standards (ICC = 0.77-0.84). When comparing LVEF estimates for randomized single POCUS videos, the ICC between the ML model and Level III echocardiographers' estimates was 0.772, and it was 0.778 for videos where quantitative LVEF was feasible. When the Level III echocardiographer reviewed all POCUS videos for a participant, the ICC improved to 0.794 and 0.843 when only accounting for studies that could be segmented. The ML model's LVEF estimates also correlated well with LVEF derived from formal echocardiogram reports (ICC = 0.798).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that clinician-driven cardiac POCUS produces ML model LVEF estimates that correlate well with expert interpretation and echo reported LVEF.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Echo research and practice - 11(2024), 1 vom: 28. März, Seite 9 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Luong, Christina L [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Artificial intelligence |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 30.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s44156-024-00043-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370287789 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370287789 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240331001418.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240329s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s44156-024-00043-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1357.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370287789 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38539236 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Luong, Christina L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Validation of machine learning models for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction on point-of-care ultrasound |b insights on features that impact performance |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 30.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. Crown. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) algorithms can accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from echocardiography, but their performance on cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is not well understood | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: We evaluate the performance of an ML model for estimation of LVEF on cardiac POCUS compared with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and formal echo reported LVEF | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Clinicians at a tertiary care heart failure clinic prospectively scanned 138 participants using hand-carried devices. Video data were analyzed offline by an ML model for LVEF. We compared the ML model's performance with Level III echocardiographers' interpretation and echo reported LVEF | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: There were 138 participants scanned, yielding 1257 videos. The ML model generated LVEF predictions on 341 videos. We observed a good intraclass correlation (ICC) between the ML model's predictions and the reference standards (ICC = 0.77-0.84). When comparing LVEF estimates for randomized single POCUS videos, the ICC between the ML model and Level III echocardiographers' estimates was 0.772, and it was 0.778 for videos where quantitative LVEF was feasible. When the Level III echocardiographer reviewed all POCUS videos for a participant, the ICC improved to 0.794 and 0.843 when only accounting for studies that could be segmented. The ML model's LVEF estimates also correlated well with LVEF derived from formal echocardiogram reports (ICC = 0.798) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that clinician-driven cardiac POCUS produces ML model LVEF estimates that correlate well with expert interpretation and echo reported LVEF | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Artificial intelligence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Echocardiography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Heart failure | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Machine learning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Point-of-care ultrasound | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jafari, Mohammad H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Behnami, Delaram |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shah, Yaksh R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Straatman, Lynn |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Van Woudenberg, Nathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Christoff, Leah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gwadry, Nancy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hawkins, Nathaniel M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sayre, Eric C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yeung, Darwin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tsang, Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gin, Ken |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jue, John |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nair, Parvathy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abolmaesumi, Purang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tsang, Teresa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Echo research and practice |d 2014 |g 11(2024), 1 vom: 28. März, Seite 9 |w (DE-627)NLM255801734 |x 2055-0464 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:03 |g pages:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s44156-024-00043-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 11 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 28 |c 03 |h 9 | ||