Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block verses other paraspinal fascial plane blocks and local infiltration for enhanced pain control after spine surgery : a systematic review
© 2024. The Author(s)..
Spinal surgeries are accompanied by excessive pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction during the procedure. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) blocks for spinal surgeries are a recent addition to regional anesthesia to improve postoperative pain management. When performing a classical TLIP (cTLIP) block, anesthetics are injected between the muscle (m.) multifidus and m. longissimus. During a modified TLIP (mTLIP) block, anesthetics are injected between the m. longissimus and m. iliocostalis instead. Our systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of TLIP blocks in improving postoperative outcomes in spinal surgery through an analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).We conducted a systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria required studies to be RCTs in English that used TLIP blocks during spinal surgery and report both outcome measures. Outcome data includes postoperative opioid consumption and pain.A total of 17 RCTs were included. The use of a TLIP block significantly decreases postoperative opioid use and pain compared to using general anesthesia (GA) plus 0.9% saline with no increase in complications. There were mixed outcomes when compared against wound infiltration with local anesthesia. When compared with erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB), TLIP blocks often decreased analgesic use, however, this did not always translate to decreased pain. The cTLIP and mTLP block methods had comparable postoperative outcomes but the mTLIP block had a significantly higher percentage of one-time block success.The accumulation of the current literature demonstrates that TLIP blocks are superior to non-block procedures in terms of analgesia requirements and reported pain throughout the hospitalization in patients who underwent spinal surgery. The various levels of success seen with wound infiltration and ESPB could be due to the nature of the different spinal procedures. For example, studies that saw superiority with TLIP blocks included fusion surgeries which is a more invasive procedure resulting in increased postoperative pain compared to discectomies.The results of our systematic review include moderate-quality evidence that show TLIP blocks provide effective pain control after spinal surgery. Although, the application of mTLIP blocks is more successful, more studies are needed to confirm that superiority of mTLIP over cTLIP blocks. Additionally, further high-quality research is needed to verify the potential benefit of TLIP blocks as a common practice for spinal surgeries.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC anesthesiology - 24(2024), 1 vom: 28. März, Seite 122 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Patel, Tarika D [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Analgesia |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 29.03.2024 Date Revised 30.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12871-024-02500-1 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370286073 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370286073 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240331001400.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240329s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12871-024-02500-1 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1357.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370286073 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38539065 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Patel, Tarika D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block verses other paraspinal fascial plane blocks and local infiltration for enhanced pain control after spine surgery |b a systematic review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 29.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 30.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a Spinal surgeries are accompanied by excessive pain due to extensive dissection and muscle retraction during the procedure. Thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) blocks for spinal surgeries are a recent addition to regional anesthesia to improve postoperative pain management. When performing a classical TLIP (cTLIP) block, anesthetics are injected between the muscle (m.) multifidus and m. longissimus. During a modified TLIP (mTLIP) block, anesthetics are injected between the m. longissimus and m. iliocostalis instead. Our systematic review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of TLIP blocks in improving postoperative outcomes in spinal surgery through an analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).We conducted a systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria required studies to be RCTs in English that used TLIP blocks during spinal surgery and report both outcome measures. Outcome data includes postoperative opioid consumption and pain.A total of 17 RCTs were included. The use of a TLIP block significantly decreases postoperative opioid use and pain compared to using general anesthesia (GA) plus 0.9% saline with no increase in complications. There were mixed outcomes when compared against wound infiltration with local anesthesia. When compared with erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB), TLIP blocks often decreased analgesic use, however, this did not always translate to decreased pain. The cTLIP and mTLP block methods had comparable postoperative outcomes but the mTLIP block had a significantly higher percentage of one-time block success.The accumulation of the current literature demonstrates that TLIP blocks are superior to non-block procedures in terms of analgesia requirements and reported pain throughout the hospitalization in patients who underwent spinal surgery. The various levels of success seen with wound infiltration and ESPB could be due to the nature of the different spinal procedures. For example, studies that saw superiority with TLIP blocks included fusion surgeries which is a more invasive procedure resulting in increased postoperative pain compared to discectomies.The results of our systematic review include moderate-quality evidence that show TLIP blocks provide effective pain control after spinal surgery. Although, the application of mTLIP blocks is more successful, more studies are needed to confirm that superiority of mTLIP over cTLIP blocks. Additionally, further high-quality research is needed to verify the potential benefit of TLIP blocks as a common practice for spinal surgeries | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Analgesia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pain management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Spine surgery | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Analgesics, Opioid |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a McNicholas, Meagan N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Paschell, Peyton A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arnold, Paul M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lee, Cheng-Ting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC anesthesiology |d 2001 |g 24(2024), 1 vom: 28. März, Seite 122 |w (DE-627)NLM116144939 |x 1471-2253 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:03 |g pages:122 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02500-1 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 28 |c 03 |h 122 | ||