Comparing the clinical practice and prescribing safety of locum and permanent doctors : observational study of primary care consultations in England
© 2024. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Temporary doctors, known as locums, are a key component of the medical workforce in the NHS but evidence on differences in quality and safety between locum and permanent doctors is limited. We aimed to examine differences in the clinical practice, and prescribing safety for locum and permanent doctors working in primary care in England.
METHODS: We accessed electronic health care records (EHRs) for 3.5 million patients from the CPRD GOLD database with linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics from 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2022. We used multi-level mixed effects logistic regression to compare consultations with locum and permanent GPs for several patient outcomes including general practice revisits; prescribing of antibiotics; strong opioids; hypnotics; A&E visits; emergency hospital admissions; admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions; test ordering; referrals; and prescribing safety indicators while controlling for patient and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: Consultations with locum GPs were 22% more likely to involve a prescription for an antibiotic (OR = 1.22 (1.21 to 1.22)), 8% more likely to involve a prescription for a strong opioid (OR = 1.08 (1.06 to 1.09)), 4% more likely to be followed by an A&E visit on the same day (OR = 1.04 (1.01 to 1.08)) and 5% more likely to be followed by an A&E visit within 1 to 7 days (OR = 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08)). Consultations with a locum were 12% less likely to lead to a practice revisit within 7 days (OR = 0.88 (0.87 to 0.88)), 4% less likely to involve a prescription for a hypnotic (OR = 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98)), 15% less likely to involve a referral (OR = 0.85 (0.84 to 0.86)) and 19% less likely to involve a test (OR = 0.81 (0.80 to 0.82)). We found no evidence that emergency admissions, ACSC admissions and eight out of the eleven prescribing safety indicators were different if patients were seen by a locum or a permanent GP.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite existing concerns, the clinical practice and performance of locum GPs did not appear to be systematically different from that of permanent GPs. The practice and performance of both locum and permanent GPs is likely shaped by the organisational setting and systems within which they work.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC medicine - 22(2024), 1 vom: 27. März, Seite 126 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Grigoroglou, Christos [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anti-Bacterial Agents |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.03.2024 Date Revised 29.03.2024 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12916-024-03332-z |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370220218 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370220218 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240330001526.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240328s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12916-024-03332-z |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1355.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370220218 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38532468 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Grigoroglou, Christos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparing the clinical practice and prescribing safety of locum and permanent doctors |b observational study of primary care consultations in England |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 29.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2024. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Temporary doctors, known as locums, are a key component of the medical workforce in the NHS but evidence on differences in quality and safety between locum and permanent doctors is limited. We aimed to examine differences in the clinical practice, and prescribing safety for locum and permanent doctors working in primary care in England | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We accessed electronic health care records (EHRs) for 3.5 million patients from the CPRD GOLD database with linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics from 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2022. We used multi-level mixed effects logistic regression to compare consultations with locum and permanent GPs for several patient outcomes including general practice revisits; prescribing of antibiotics; strong opioids; hypnotics; A&E visits; emergency hospital admissions; admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions; test ordering; referrals; and prescribing safety indicators while controlling for patient and practice characteristics | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Consultations with locum GPs were 22% more likely to involve a prescription for an antibiotic (OR = 1.22 (1.21 to 1.22)), 8% more likely to involve a prescription for a strong opioid (OR = 1.08 (1.06 to 1.09)), 4% more likely to be followed by an A&E visit on the same day (OR = 1.04 (1.01 to 1.08)) and 5% more likely to be followed by an A&E visit within 1 to 7 days (OR = 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08)). Consultations with a locum were 12% less likely to lead to a practice revisit within 7 days (OR = 0.88 (0.87 to 0.88)), 4% less likely to involve a prescription for a hypnotic (OR = 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98)), 15% less likely to involve a referral (OR = 0.85 (0.84 to 0.86)) and 19% less likely to involve a test (OR = 0.81 (0.80 to 0.82)). We found no evidence that emergency admissions, ACSC admissions and eight out of the eleven prescribing safety indicators were different if patients were seen by a locum or a permanent GP | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Despite existing concerns, the clinical practice and performance of locum GPs did not appear to be systematically different from that of permanent GPs. The practice and performance of both locum and permanent GPs is likely shaped by the organisational setting and systems within which they work | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Electronic health records | |
| 650 | 4 | |a General practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Locum doctors | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical workforce | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patient safety | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Quality | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Walshe, Kieran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kontopantelis, Evangelos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferguson, Jane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stringer, Gemma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ashcroft, Darren M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allen, Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC medicine |d 2003 |g 22(2024), 1 vom: 27. März, Seite 126 |w (DE-627)NLM143503421 |x 1741-7015 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g day:27 |g month:03 |g pages:126 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03332-z |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2024 |e 1 |b 27 |c 03 |h 126 | ||