Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care : a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..
Respect for patient autonomy is paramount in resolving ethical tensions in end-of-life care. The concept of relational autonomy has contributed to this debate; however, scholars often use this concept in a fragmented manner. This leads to partial answers on ascertaining patients' true wishes, meaningfully engaging patients' significant others, balancing interests among patients and significant others, and determining clinicians' obligations to change patients' unconventional convictions to enhance patient autonomy. A satisfactory solution based on relational autonomy must incorporate patients' competence (apart from decisional capacity), authenticity (their true desires or beliefs) and the involvement level of their significant others. To that end, we argue that John Christman's procedural approach to relational autonomy provides critical insights, such as the diachronic or socio-historical personhood, sustained critical reflection and his recent explication of the nature of asymmetrical relationships and helpful interlocutors. This study reviews Christman's account, proposes minor modifications and advocates for an integrated three-dimensional model for medical decision-making. Clarifying the relationship among the three elements promotes an ethical framework with a coherent understanding of relational autonomy. This model not only provides a descriptive and normative framework for end-of-life care practice but also reconsiders the nature of the clinician-patient relationship and its normative implications. We further present a case study to illustrate the merits of our proposed model. Altogether, our proposal will help navigate complex medical decision-making, foster trust and negotiate shared values between patients and their significant others, particularly in end-of-life care.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - year:2024 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of medical ethics - (2024) vom: 25. März |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Foo, Kar-Fai [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Decision Making |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 25.03.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status Publisher |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1136/jme-2023-109818 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM370173414 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM370173414 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240327000548.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240327s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme-2023-109818 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1349.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM370173414 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)38527787 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)jme-2023-109818 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Foo, Kar-Fai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care |b a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.03.2024 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status Publisher | ||
| 520 | |a © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. | ||
| 520 | |a Respect for patient autonomy is paramount in resolving ethical tensions in end-of-life care. The concept of relational autonomy has contributed to this debate; however, scholars often use this concept in a fragmented manner. This leads to partial answers on ascertaining patients' true wishes, meaningfully engaging patients' significant others, balancing interests among patients and significant others, and determining clinicians' obligations to change patients' unconventional convictions to enhance patient autonomy. A satisfactory solution based on relational autonomy must incorporate patients' competence (apart from decisional capacity), authenticity (their true desires or beliefs) and the involvement level of their significant others. To that end, we argue that John Christman's procedural approach to relational autonomy provides critical insights, such as the diachronic or socio-historical personhood, sustained critical reflection and his recent explication of the nature of asymmetrical relationships and helpful interlocutors. This study reviews Christman's account, proposes minor modifications and advocates for an integrated three-dimensional model for medical decision-making. Clarifying the relationship among the three elements promotes an ethical framework with a coherent understanding of relational autonomy. This model not only provides a descriptive and normative framework for end-of-life care practice but also reconsiders the nature of the clinician-patient relationship and its normative implications. We further present a case study to illustrate the merits of our proposed model. Altogether, our proposal will help navigate complex medical decision-making, foster trust and negotiate shared values between patients and their significant others, particularly in end-of-life care | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision Making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Personhood | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Professional-Patient Relations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Relational Autonomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Terminal Care | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Ya-Ping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Cheng-Pei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Yu-Chun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d 1976 |g (2024) vom: 25. März |w (DE-627)NLM000033065 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g day:25 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109818 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2024 |b 25 |c 03 | ||